首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Non-invasive Diagnostic Tests in Cystic Fibrosis-Related Liver Disease: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Network Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Non-invasive Diagnostic Tests in Cystic Fibrosis-Related Liver Disease: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Network Meta-Analysis

机译:囊性纤维化相关肝病中的非侵入性诊断试验:诊断测试精度网络META分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: Cystic fibrosis-related liver disease (CFLD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). Several non-invasive diagnostic methods have been proposed as screening tools for CFLD. Our aim was to rank all available non-invasive modalities for diagnostic performance. Methods: A systematic search was performed in five medical databases to find studies which reported on any single or composite non-invasive diagnostic test (as an index test) compared to the Debray, the EuroCare or the Colombo criteria (as a reference standard). Ranking was carried out with a Bayesian diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis based on superiority indices, calculated for pooled sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The study was registered under CRD42020155846 in PROSPERO. Results: Fifteen studies with 15 index tests and a combination of them were included. The New criteria proposed by Koh et al. – which represent a composite diagnostic definition for CFLD including liver biochemistry, ultrasonography, transient elastography and fibrosis markers—had the best performance for detecting CFLD (Se:94%[CI:58–100], Sp:72%[CI:52–84]); while transient elastography (Se:65%[CI:56–74], Sp:88%[CI:84–91]) and a combination of it with a tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-4 measurement (Se:78%[CI:30–100], Sp:64%[CI:18–95%]) proved to be the second and third best options, respectively. In the imaging techniques subgroup, transient elastography (Se:66%[CI:57–72], Sp:88%[CI:85–91%]), acoustic radiation force impulse in the right lobe (Se:54%[CI:33–74], Sp:88%[CI:66–96]) and that in the left lobe (Se:55%[CI:23–81], Sp:82%[CI:50–95]) were ranked the highest. Comparing biochemical markers/fibrosis indices, the measurement of the Forns index (Se:72%[CI:25–99], Sp:63%[CI:16–94]), the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio (Se:55%[CI:41–68], Sp:83%[CI:66–89]) and alkaline phosphatase (Se:63%[CI:18–93], Sp:64%[CI:19–95]) were ranked the highest. Conclusion: The New criteria show the best diagnostic performance. In clinical practice, transient elastography seems to be a simple, cheap and non-invasive tool, outperforming imaging, biochemical and fibrosis tests for detecting CFLD. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.
机译:背景和宗旨:囊性纤维化相关肝病(CFLD)是囊性纤维化(CF)中发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。已经提出了几种非侵入性诊断方法作为CFLD的筛选工具。我们的目标是对诊断表现进行排名所有可用的非侵入方式。方法:在五个医疗数据库中进行系统搜索,以查找与冻结,EUROCARE或COLOMBO标准(作为参考标准)的任何单一或复合无侵入性诊断测试(作为指数试验)报告的研究。基于优越性指数的贝叶斯诊断测试精度网络元分析进行排名,用于汇集灵敏度(SE)和特异性(SP),具有95%置信区间(CI)。该研究在Prospero的CRD42020155846下注册。结果:包括15项索引试验的十五项研究和它们的组合。 Koh等人提出的新标准。 - 代表CFLD的复合诊断定义,包括肝脏生物化学,超声检查,瞬时弹性摄影和纤维化标志物 - 检测CFLD的最佳性能(SE:94%[CI:58-100],SP:72%[CI:52- 84]);瞬态弹性摄影(SE:65%[CI:56-74],SP:88%[CI:84-91])和与金属蛋白酶-4测量的组织抑制剂的组合(SE:78%[CI: 30-100],SP:64%[CI:18-95%])分别被证明是第二和第三最佳选择。在成像技术亚组中,瞬态弹性显影(SE:66%[CI:57-72],SP:88%[CI:85-91%]),右侧叶中的声学辐射力脉冲(SE:54%[CI :33-74],SP:88%[CI:66-96]),在左叶中(SE:55%[CI:23-81],SP:82%[CI:50-95])排名最高。比较生化标志/纤维化指数,福斯索引的测量(SE:72%[CI:25-99],SP:63%[CI:16-94]),天冬氨酸氨基转移酶 - 血小板比(SE: 55%[CI:41-68],SP:83%[CI:66-89])和碱性磷酸酶(SE:63%[CI:18-93],SP:64%[CI:19-95])被排名最高。结论:新标准显示出最佳诊断性能。在临床实践中,瞬态弹性显影似乎是一种简单,便宜和非侵入性的工具,表现优于检测CFLD的成像,生化和纤维化试验。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号