首页> 外文期刊>Asian spine journal. >Response to: Letter to the Editor, Is Anterior-Only Fixation Adequate for Three-Column Injuries of the Cervical Spine?
【24h】

Response to: Letter to the Editor, Is Anterior-Only Fixation Adequate for Three-Column Injuries of the Cervical Spine?

机译:回应:致编辑的信,是仅适用于颈椎三柱伤的前固定吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

We are truly grateful for the opportunity to respond to this Letter to the Editor concerning our recently published study entitled “Is anterior-only fixation adequate for three-column injuries of the cervical spine? [1].” (1) The three-column concept is one of the first and broader classification systems used. The AO classification system is much fine-tuned and is still under development. Moreover, it does not use the three-column concept that is used traditionally. The initial AO classification was developed for thoracolumbar injuries [2] and was later adapted for the sub-axial cervical spine [3]. In the present study, the primary inclusion criteria were traumatic injury to the sub-axial cervical spine (anterior, middle, and posterior), and after that available data were sub classified according to the AO classification. We do accept the fact of not mentioning new additional modifiers. But we have certain limitations as this was a retrospective study (as mentioned in manuscript).
机译:我们真的很感激有机会回应这封信给主编辑,了解有权题为“是宫颈脊柱的三柱伤害的前固定? [1]。“ (1)三列概念是所使用的第一和更广泛的分类系统之一。 AO分类系统很细化,仍在开发中。 此外,它不使用传统上使用的三列概念。 初始AO分类是针对胸腰椎损伤的[2]开发的,后来适用于亚轴颈脊柱[3]。 在本研究中,主要包涵标准对亚轴颈脊柱(前部,中间,后部)的创伤性损伤,并且在可用数据根据AO分类进行分类后。 我们确实接受了未提及新的额外修饰符的事实。 但是我们有一定的局限性,因为这是一个回顾性研究(如手稿中所述)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号