首页> 外文期刊>Asian spine journal. >Comparing the Effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique and Kinesiotaping in Mechanical Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Non-blinded, Two-Group, Pretest–Posttest Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol
【24h】

Comparing the Effectiveness of the Muscle Energy Technique and Kinesiotaping in Mechanical Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Non-blinded, Two-Group, Pretest–Posttest Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol

机译:比较肌肉能量技术和梭痘在机械骶髂关节功能障碍中的有效性:非盲,两组,预测试后的可随机临床试验方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design Two-group, pretest–posttest randomized clinical trial. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of the muscle energy technique (MET) and Kinesiotaping (KT) in addition to conventional physiotherapy among patients with mechanical sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD). Overview of Literature Patients with SIJD suffer from lower back and gluteal pain, as well as stiffness, due to restricted pelvic joint movement. To restore function and reduce pain among individuals with mechanical SIJD, the MET and KT may be helpful. However, a limited number of studies have compared MET and KT in mechanical SIJD. Methods A total of 40 male and female participants aging between 30 and 50 years experiencing unilateral pain around the gluteal area, groin area, and lower limbs for more than 4 weeks but less than 1 year will be selected. Patients will then be randomized into two groups: METCp (n=20) and KTCp groups (n=20). The METCp group will receive MET along with conventional physiotherapy, while the KTCp group will receive conventional physiotherapy with KT. Both groups will receive three alternating days of treatment per week that will continue for 4 weeks. The modified Oswestry Disability Index, a digital pressure algometer, and sacroiliac joint motion testing will be used for evaluation. Between- and within-group pre- and post-intervention results for mechanical SIJD were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test/paired t -test and Mann-Whitney U -test/independent t -test. Results Modified Oswestry Disability Index, digital pressure algometer, and sacroiliac joint motion will be measured at baseline, 2nd week during intervention, and 4th week at the end of intervention Conclusions The present study will provide data regarding the effects of MET and KT among patients with mechanical SIJD.
机译:研究设计两组,预测试后可随机临床试验。目的在机械骶髂关节功能障碍患者(SIJD)中,评估肌肉能量技术(MET)和kinesiotaping(KT)的疗效除了常规的物理治疗外。由于盆腔关节运动限制,SIJD的文献患者概述患有下背和衰弱,以及刚度。为了恢复功能并减少机械SIJD的个人疼痛,遇见和KT可能会有所帮助。然而,在机械SIJD中将有限数量的研究进行了比较和KT。方法共有40名男性和女性参与者在30至50岁之间经历单侧疼痛,在臀部区域,腹股沟面积和下肢下降超过4周,但将选择不到1年。然后将患者随机分为两组:MetCP(n = 20)和KTCP组(n = 20)。 Metcp Group将与常规物理疗法接受会议,而KTCP组将通过KT接受常规物理疗法。两组将每周接受三天的治疗日,将持续4周。改性的Oswestry残疾指数,数字压力术术和骶髂关节运动测试将用于评估。使用Wilcoxon签名 - 等级测试/配对T -Test和Mann-Whitney U -Test / Indelsion T -Test进行比较 - 在​​组和介入的机械SIJD中与术后干预后期和干预后的干预结果之间。结果改良Oswestry残疾指数,数字压力术术和骶髂关节运动将在基线,第2周期间在干预期间测量,第4周结束时结束时,本研究将提供有关患者患者患者和KT的影响的数据机械SIJD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号