...
首页> 外文期刊>BDJ open. >The interrelationship between confidence and correctness in a multiple-choice assessment: pointing out misconceptions and assuring valuable questions
【24h】

The interrelationship between confidence and correctness in a multiple-choice assessment: pointing out misconceptions and assuring valuable questions

机译:多项选择评估中信心与正确性之间的相互关系:指出误解并确保有价值的问题

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to better understand the interfaces of being correct or incorrect and confident or unconfident; aiming to point out misconceptions and assure valuable questions. This cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of second-year dental students (n?=?29) attending a preclinical endodontics course. Students answered 20 multiple-choice questions (“basic” or “moderate” level) on endodontics, all of which were followed by one confidence question (scale). Our two research questions were: (1) How was the students’ performance, considering correctness, misconceptions, and level of confidence? (2) Were the questions valuable, appropriate and friendly, and which ones led to misconceptions? Four situations arouse from the interrelationship between question correctness and confidence level: (1st) correct and confident, (2nd) correct and unconfident, (3rd) incorrect and confident (misconception) and (4th) incorrect and unconfident. Statistical analysis (α?=?5%) considered the interaction between (a) students’ performance with misconceptions and confidence; (b) question’s difficulty with correctness and confidence; and (c) misconceptions with clinical and negative questions. Students had 92.5% of correctness and 84.6% of confidence level. Nine students were responsible for the 12 misconceptions. Students who had more misconceptions had lower correctness (P??0.001). High achieving students had low confidence in their incorrect responses (P?=?0.047). ‘Moderate’ questions had more incorrectness (P??0.05) and less confidence (P?=?0.02) than ‘basic’. All questions were considered valuable [for example, the ones that presented images or required a mental picture of a clinical scenario, since they induced less misconception (P?=?0.007)]. There was no difference in misconceptions between negative questions and other questions (P?=?0.96). Preclinical endodontic students were highly correct and very confident in their responses. Students who had more misconceptions had also the lowest performance in the assessment. Questions were valuable; but some will worth further improvement for the future. A multiple-choice assessment, when combined with confidence questions, provided helpful information regarding misconceptions and questions value.
机译:本研究的目的是更好地了解正确或不正确和自信或非宣告的界面;旨在指出误解并确保宝贵的问题。使用第二年牙科学生的便利样本进行这种横截面研究(N?=?29),参加了临床前的脊髓术课程。学生回答了20个多项选择题(“基本”或“中等”级别)在牙髓肿瘤上,所有这些都是一个自信的问题(比例)。我们的两项研究问题是:(1)学生的表现如何,考虑正确,误解和信心水平? (2)质疑有价值,适当和友好的问题,哪些导致误解?四种情况从问题正确和置信水平之间的相互关系唤起:(1st)正确和自信,(第二)正确和不宣告,(第3)不正确和自信(误解)和(第4)不正确和不忠告。统计分析(α?=?5%)认为(a)学生表现之间的互动与误解和信心; (b)质疑难以正确和信心; (c)与临床和负面问题的误解。学生的正确性占92.5%,占置信水平的84.6%。九名学生对12个误解负责。具有更多误解的学生具有较低的正确性(P?&?0.001)。高层学生对其不正确的反应有低信心(P?= 0.047)。 “中等”的问题有更多不正确(P?&?0.05),少于置信(p?= 0.02)。所有问题都被认为是有价值的[例如,呈现图像或所需的临床情景的心理图像的问题,因为它们诱导误解(P?= 0.007)]。负面问题和其他问题之间的误解没有差异(p?= 0.96)。临床前牙髓学生对他们的反应非常正确,非常有信心。有更多误解的学生在评估中也具有最低的表现。问题是有价值的;但有些人会对未来进一步改善。在与信心问题结合时,多项选择评估提供有助于有关误解和问题值的有用信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号