...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Research data sharing in the Australian national science agency: Understanding the relative importance of organisational, disciplinary and domain-specific influences
【24h】

Research data sharing in the Australian national science agency: Understanding the relative importance of organisational, disciplinary and domain-specific influences

机译:澳大利亚国家科学局研究数据共享:了解组织,纪律和域特定影响的相对重要性

获取原文
           

摘要

This study delineates the relative importance of organisational, research discipline and application domain factors in influencing researchers’ data sharing practices in Australia’s national scientific and industrial research agency. We surveyed 354 researchers and found that the number of data deposits made by researchers were related to the openness of the data culture and the contractual inhibitors experienced by researchers. Multi-level modelling revealed that organisational unit membership explained 10%, disciplinary membership explained 6%, and domain membership explained 4% of the variance in researchers’ intentions to share research data. However, only the organisational measure of openness to data sharing explained significant unique variance in data sharing. Thus, whereas previous research has tended to focus on disciplinary influences on data sharing, this study suggests that factors operating within the organisation have the most powerful influence on researchers’ data sharing practices. The research received approval from the organisation’s Human Research Ethics Committee (no. 014/18).
机译:本研究界定了组织,研究学科和应用领域因素在影响澳大利亚国家科学和工业研究机构的研究人员数据共享实践中的相对重要性。我们调查了354名研究人员,发现研究人员的数据存款数量与数据文化的开放性和研究人员所经历的合同抑制剂有关。多级模型显示,组织单位会员资格解释了10%,纪律会员资格解释了6%,域名成员资格解释了研究人员意图分享研究数据的差异的4%。但是,只有数据共享的开放性的组织衡量标准解释了数据共享中的显着独特方差。因此,此前的研究趋于关注对数据共享的纪律影响,而本研究表明本组织内运营的因素对研究人员的数据共享实践具有最强大的影响。该研究得到了组织人类研究伦理委员会的批准(第014/18号)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号