...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Slow and steady wins the race: The behaviour and welfare of commercial faster growing broiler breeds compared to a commercial slower growing breed
【24h】

Slow and steady wins the race: The behaviour and welfare of commercial faster growing broiler breeds compared to a commercial slower growing breed

机译:缓慢而稳定地赢得了比赛:与商业较慢的生长品种相比,商业增长较快的肉鸡品种的行为和福利

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Broilers have been bred for fast growth which has led to welfare problems such as high mortality, lameness and skin lesions. Slower growing breeds are thought to have better welfare but are not as efficient in production. This study investigated welfare, behaviour, production and meat quality of faster growing broilers from three main commercial broiler companies (breeds FA, FB and FC) with a commercially available slower growing breed (Hubbard JA757, S). Four hundred birds of each breed (total 1600 birds) were reared in pens of 50 birds, 8 per breed (total 32 pens). Home pen behaviour was recorded once a week in hourly scan samples to get behavioural time budgets. Welfare Assessments (WA) were done when the average bird weight per breed was 2.2 and 2.5kg. Birds and feed supplied were regularly weighed by pen and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) and Average Daily Gain (ADG) were calculated at 2.2kg. Birds were then slaughtered and meat quality measures were taken. S and FC had lower mortality and culls due to lameness (P0.05 for both). Breeds FA, FB and FC grew faster, ate less feed and had better FCR and ADG (P0.05 for all). S had scores indicating higher welfare for the majority of WA measures and spent more time active and less time sitting, feeding and drinking than the other breeds (P0.05 for all). Faster growing breeds had more breast meat and S had more leg meat; although S had better meat quality scores (P0.05). Overall, S birds have improved welfare in terms of activity and welfare measure scores compared to the other breeds but take longer to reach slaughter weight and are not as efficient in production measures. However if lower mortality and improved meat quality are taken into account, as well as the premium price paid for these birds, slower growing broilers may be a viable commercial option.
机译:肉鸡已被培养用于快速增长,这导致了福利问题,如高死亡率,跛足和皮肤病变。较慢的生长品种被认为有更好的福利,但在生产中并不高效。本研究研究了来自三个主要商业肉鸡公司(品种FA,FB和FC)的较快增长的肉鸡的福利,行为,生产和肉质,具有商业上可用的生长品种(Hubbard Ja757,S)。每种品种(总共1600只鸟)的四百只鸟以50只鸟类的钢材饲养,每种品种8(总共32张)。 Home Pen行为每周记录一次每小时一次,以获得行为时间预算。当每种品种的平均禽类重量为2.2和2.5kg时,福利评估(WA)是完成的。用笔定期称量供应的禽类和饲料,并在2.2kg下计算平均每日增益(ADG)。然后屠宰鸟类,并采取肉质措施。 S和Fc由于跛足而具有较低的死亡率和剔除(两个两者0.05)。品种FA,FB和FC增长更快,饲料较少,并具有更好的FCR和ADG(P <0.05)。 S有分数表明大多数WA措施的福利更高,并且花费更多时间和更少的时间坐着,喂养和饮用而不是其他品种(P <0.05)。更快的生长品种有更多的乳房肉,并且腿部肉类;虽然S具有更好的肉质评分(P <0.05)。总体而言,与其他品种相比,S鸟类在活动和福利措施评分方面有所改善,但需要更长时间才能达到屠宰体重,并且在生产措施中并不高效。然而,如果考虑下降的死亡率和改善的肉质,以及为这些鸟类支付的优质价格,则增长较慢的肉鸡可能是可行的商业选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号