首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective
【24h】

Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective

机译:三种常用的血液采样技术对实验室小鼠福利的影响:采取动物的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Laboratory mice are the most frequently used animals in biomedical research. In accordance with guidelines for humane handling, several blood sampling techniques have been established. While the effects of these procedures on blood quality and histological alterations at the sampling site are well studied, their impact on the animals’ welfare has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, our study aimed to compare three commonly used blood sampling techniques regarding their effects on different indicators of animal welfare, including physiological and behavioural response stress parameters, including pain measures, home-cage behaviour and nest-building as well as exploratory activity and neophobia. Male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to a single blood collection from either the vena facialis , the retrobulbar sinus or the tail vessel, or were allocated to the respective control treatment. While all blood sampling techniques led to an acute increase in plasma corticosterone levels, the response was strongest in animals that underwent sampling from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus. Similar results were observed when the time-course of adrenocortical activity was monitored via corticosterone metabolites from faecal samples. Blood collection from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus also decreased exploration of novel stimuli, resulted in decreased nest-building activity and induced higher scores in the Mouse Grimace Scale. Moreover, locomotor activity and anxiety-related behaviour were strongly affected after facial vein bleeding. Interestingly, tail vessel bleeding only induced little alterations in the assessed physiological and behavioural parameters. Importantly, the observed effects in all treatment groups were no longer detectable after 24 hours, indicating only short-term impacts. Thus, by also taking the animal’s perspective and comprehensively assessing the severity of the particular sampling procedures, the results of our study contribute to Refinement within the 3R concept and allow researchers to objectively select the most appropriate and welfare-friendly blood sampling technique for a given experiment.
机译:实验室小鼠是生物医学研究中最常用的动物。根据人道处理的指导方针,已经建立了几种血液采样技术。虽然这些程序对采样现场的血液质量和组织学改动的影响得到了很好的研究,但它们对动物福利的影响尚未得到广泛调查。因此,我们的研究旨在比较三种常用的血液采样技术,了解他们对动物福利的不同指标的影响,包括生理和行为应激应激参数,包括疼痛措施,家庭笼行为和巢穴以及探索活动和新闻恐惧症。将雄性C57BL / 6J小鼠从腔体,血管鼻窦或尾部血管进行单一血液收集,或者分配给各自的对照处理。虽然所有血液采样技术导致血浆皮质酮水平急性增加,但响应在从腔护腔和鼻窦窦中进行取样的动物中最强。当通过来自粪便样品的皮质酮代谢物监测肾上腺皮质活动的时间过程时,观察到类似的结果。从腔护面部和鼻窦窦的血液收集也降低了对新型刺激的探索,导致巢建筑活动减少,并在小鼠致法尺度中引起更高的分数。此外,在面部静脉出血后,运动活性和焦虑相关行为受到强烈影响。有趣的是,尾部血管出血仅在评估的生理和行为参数中诱导更少的改变。重要的是,在24小时后,所有治疗组的观察效果不再可检测到,表明只有短期影响。因此,通过也采取动物的观点和全面评估特定采样程序的严重程度,我们的研究结果有助于在3R概念内进行改进,并允许研究人员客观地为给定的一个最合适的和福利友好的血液采样技术。实验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号