首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >The Relevance of Infant Outcome Measures: A Pilot-RCT Comparing Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Program With Care as Usual
【24h】

The Relevance of Infant Outcome Measures: A Pilot-RCT Comparing Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Program With Care as Usual

机译:婴幼儿结果措施的相关性:一种像往常一样小心婴儿三重P阳性育儿比较的试验-RCT

获取原文
           

摘要

Problems in infant mental health such as the ability to experience, regulate, and express emotional states is expressed in behavioral problems like excessive crying, feeding, and sleeping problems. Parenting programs are popular but their effectiveness on infant mental health remains uncertain. Possibly, because recent studies have focused only on parental and parent–child measures while they miss to assess infant behavioral measures. The goal of this pilot study is to fill in this gap by assessing infantile behavioral measures. We investigated the acceptance and first indicators of efficacy of the universal group parenting training Baby Triple P (BTP) compared to a care as usual (CAU) control condition focusing on early behavioral problems. In all, 49 couples were randomly allocated to receive either eight BTP sessions before birth and per telephone after birth or to take part in CAU. Infant behavior was assessed with a diary and a structured diagnostic interview. Parental self-report measures of partnership quality and parental competence were assessed before birth, 10 weeks after birth and at 6-month follow-up. Since the parent training was conducted before the birth of the child, the child’s mental health could not be assessed before the parent training. Thus, for this variable no within measurement (pre–post) could be carried out and intention-to-treat analysis was not possible. However, a between group analysis comparing BTP against CAU took place to assess effectiveness of BTP on children’s mental health. Mothers and fathers rated the program as feasible and relevant. Results indicate significant group differences in crying behavior 6 months after birth to the benefit of the intervention group. No beneficial outcomes were found for feeding and sleeping problems in infants or partnership quality, parental sense of competence in parents. Due to an unrepresentative high level of education of the participating parents and the small sample size, these findings can be considered preliminary. Nevertheless, these results allow to further investigate the effectivity of BTP in large-scale clinical trials. Behavioral diaries or diagnostic interviews for early mental health problems should be routinely implemented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in order not to miss possible behavioral changes in infants. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02313493","term_id":"NCT02313493"}} NCT02313493 .
机译:婴儿心理健康状况如体验,规范和表达情绪状态的能力,在过度哭泣,喂养和睡眠问题等行为问题中表达。育儿计划很受欢迎,但它们对婴儿心理健康的有效性仍然不确定。可能是,因为最近的研究只关注父母和家长儿童措施,同时他们错过了评估婴儿行为措施。该试点研究的目标是通过评估婴儿行为措施来填补这种差距。我们调查了普遍组育儿培训婴儿三重P(BTP)的疗效的验收和第一指标与常规(CAU)控制条件关注早期行为问题。总而言之,随机分配49个夫妇,以在出生前和出生后的每次电话或参加CAU之前接收八个BTP会话。用日记和结构化诊断面试评估婴儿行为。父母自我报告伙伴关系质量和父母能力的衡量措施在出生前,出生后10周和6个月的跟进后评估。由于父母培训在孩子诞生前进行,因此在父母培训之前无法评估孩子的心理健康。因此,对于该变量,不能在测量(预先柱)内,不能进行,并且不可能进行意向治疗分析。然而,对比较BTP对CAU的分析之间的一个分析,以评估BTP对儿童心理健康的有效性。母亲和父亲将该计划评为可行和相关。结果在出生后6个月内表明哭泣行为的显着群体差异为干预组。没有发现在婴儿或伙伴关系质量,父母的父母的父母的父母的问题中没有任何有益的结果。由于参与父母和小样本规模小的高等教育,这些发现可以被认为是初步的。然而,这些结果允许进一步探讨BTP在大规模临床试验中对BTP的有效性。应在随机对照试验(RCT)中常规实施早期心理健康问题的行为日记或诊断访谈,以免错过婴儿可能的行为变化。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov,标识符{“类型”:“临床试验”,“attrs”:{“text”:“nct02313493”,“term_id”:“nct02313493”}} nct02313493。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号