首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Social or Economic Goals? The Professional Goal Orientation of Students Enrolled in STEM and Non-STEM Majors in University
【24h】

Social or Economic Goals? The Professional Goal Orientation of Students Enrolled in STEM and Non-STEM Majors in University

机译:社会或经济目标? 学生的专业目标定位参加大学茎干和非茎主力

获取原文
           

摘要

Various studies try to disentangle the gender-specific competencies or decisions that lead to a career in a STEM field and try to find a way to encourage more women to pursue this kind of career. The present study examines differences in the meaning of work (i.e., their professional goal orientation) of students who are enrolled in STEM or non-STEM programs in tertiary education. Based on the background that gender stereotypes associate women and men with communal or agentic roles respectively, we expected that women in STEM subjects differ in their professional goal orientation from women in non-STEM programs. More precisely, women who are enrolled in a STEM major are expected to be less oriented to social and communal goal orientations than women in non-STEM university programs. In a sample of 5,857 second-year university students of the German National Educational Panel Study, three profiles of professional goal orientation were confirmed in a latent profile analysis. As expected, women were more oriented toward social aspects of occupations, whereas men more likely belonged to a profile with high importance for economic aspects of occupations. Moreover, students enrolled in STEM programs more likely belonged to the profile of economic goal orientation. There was, however, no interaction of gender and STEM program: Women in STEM fields did not differ in their occupational goal orientation from women enrolled in non-STEM programs. Based on these findings and on a goal congruity perspective, future interventions aiming at overcoming the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields should consider the individual meaning of work and the goals that are associated with STEM occupations.
机译:各种研究试图解开性别特定的能力或决定,这些能力或决定导致干部领域的职业生涯,并试图找到一种鼓励更多女性追求这种职业的方法。本研究审查了在高等教育中纳入词干或非干部计划的学生的工作意义(即,他们的专业目标方向)的差异。根据性别陈规定型妇女和男子分别与公共或助理作用的基础,我们预计茎科目的妇女在非干期方案中的妇女的专业目标方向不同。更确切地说,预计在茎上重视的妇女将少于社会和公共目标取向,而非威斯大学计划的妇女。在德国国家教育小组研究的5,857名二年大学生的样本中,在潜在的概念分析中确认了三个专业目标方向的概况。正如预期的那样,妇女更朝着职业的社会方面导向,而男人则更有可能属于具有高度重视职业方面的形象。此外,学生们注册的茎计划更有可能属于经济目标定位的形象。然而,没有对性别和词干计划的互动:茎田的妇女在纳入非干期计划中的妇女的职业目标方向没有差异。基于这些调查结果和目标发光性观点,旨在克服STEM田地妇女普遍存在的未来干预措施应考虑工作的个人意义和与词干职业相关的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号