首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Corrigendum: How and Why Do Students Use Learning Strategies? A Mixed Methods Study on Learning Strategies and Desirable Difficulties With Effective Strategy Users
【24h】

Corrigendum: How and Why Do Students Use Learning Strategies? A Mixed Methods Study on Learning Strategies and Desirable Difficulties With Effective Strategy Users

机译:逆势:学生如何以及为什么使用学习策略? 有效策略用户的学习策略和理想困难的混合方法研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In the original article, there was an error. The article states that “Results from the analysis werediscussed with the second and fourth author. Finally, in a process of selective coding by the first,second and fourth author, themes were related to each other to come to an overarching model ofthe data” (p. 4).However, as stated correctly in the Author Contributions, coding was conducted incollaboration between the first, second and last (i.e., fifth instead of fourth) author. Results fromthe analysis were discussed with the third and fourth author.A correction has been made to the Methods section, subsection Analysis, Paragraph 2:Initial, open coding was done by the first author. This was done in a line-by-line fashion,in which representative codes were assigned to the participants’ utterances. During this process,several meetings were held with the second and last author to discuss the codes. After arriving at aninitial codebook, codes were related to each other in a process of axial coding. During this process,codes were compared and contrasted with each other, looking for connections in order to createthemes from overlapping codes. This step was initially done by the first author, with the second andlast author each coding a non-overlapping 25% of the codebook to ensure rigor. Findings from thisstep were discussed until consensus was reached. Results from the analysis were discussed with thethird and fourth author. Finally, in a process of selective coding by the first, second and last author,themes were related to each other in order to come to an overarching model of the data.The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusionsof the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
机译:在原文中,有一个错误。该条称说:“分析与第二和第四作者的分析结果。最后,在第一,第二和第四作者的选择性编码过程中,主题彼此相关,以达到数据的总体模型“(第4页)。然而,与作者贡献中的正确说明一样,掌握,编码是在第一,第二个和最后一次(即第五,第四个)作者之间进行注入。通过第三和第四作者讨论了分析结果。对第一个作者进行了第三次和第四作者的校正。这是以逐行的方式完成的,其中代表代码被分配给参与者的话语。在此过程中,有几次会议与第二次和最后一个作者举行讨论该代码。在到达Aninitial码本之后,代码在轴向编码过程中彼此相关。在此过程中,对代码进行比较和彼此对比,寻找连接,以便从重叠代码捕获。此步骤最初由第一作者完成,第二个andlast作者每个编码非重叠25%的码本以确保严谨。从达成共识之前讨论了此目的地的调查结果。分析结果与第四作者讨论过。最后,在第一,第二和最后一个作者的选择性编码过程中,主题彼此相关,以便到达数据的总体模型。作者为这个错误而道歉,并说明这不会改变科学本文以任何方式结论。原始文章已更新。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号