...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health >Controversies in the diagnosis of polycystic ovarysyndrome
【24h】

Controversies in the diagnosis of polycystic ovarysyndrome

机译:诊断多囊卵巢综合征的争论

获取原文
           

摘要

Polycystic ovary syndrome is a common endocrinological condition which is foundto be prevalent in 5–10% of women of reproductive age. Historically, acombination of anovulation and androgen excess was considered a hallmark in thediagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Addition of ultrasound features ofpolycystic ovary syndrome has improved the detection of variation in thepolycystic ovary syndrome phenotype. Despite the widespread use of consensusdiagnostic criteria, there remain several unresolved controversies in thediagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Difficulty arises in methods ofassessment and types of androgens to be measured to detect biochemicalhyperandrogenism, setting a cut-off value for the diagnosis of clinicalhyperandrogenism, setting an ultrasound threshold of antral follicle count todiagnose polycystic ovaries and also diagnosing this condition in adolescencewhere there is no clear definition for ‘irregular cycles’. This article looks atvarious controversies in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Keywords: PCOS, diagnosis, polycystic ovary syndromeIntroductionPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrinological condition which isfound to be prevalent in 5–10% of women in the reproductive age group~(1) and can vary between subpopulations. It was in 1935 that Stein and Leventhalfirst described this unique gynaecological condition. They described this syndromebased on seven women who had a combination of obesity, hirsutism, amenorrhoea andbilateral enlarged polycystic ovaries.~(2,3) Since its firstcharacterisation, there has been a vast evolvement in our understanding of itsetiology, diagnosis and treatment. In the early 1990s, the National Institutes ofHealth (NIH) first proposed a diagnostic criterion for PCOS. It defined PCOS as acombination of oligo-anovulation and androgen excess after ruling out all otherreasons for anovulatory infertility.~(4) Ultrasound criteria for polycystic ovaries were considered ‘suggestive’ butnot diagnostic of PCOS. These criteria were based on consensus expert opinion ratherthan the evidence from clinical trials. In 2003, the European Society for HumanReproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the American Society for ReproductiveMedicine (ASRM) amended the NIH criteria and included ultrasound features ofpolycystic ovaries as the third diagnostic criteria.~(5) The diagnosis of PCOS was established if a woman met two criteria out of thethree. This was based on the observation that polycystic ovaries were consistent inwomen with biochemical and clinical evidence of the syndrome. Women with PCOSdiagnosed by the Rotterdam Criteria can be further divided into four phenotypes, Ato D, based on the criteria qualifying for diagnosis. In 2006, the Androgen ExcessSociety (AES) reviewed existing data and concluded that the original criteria set byNIH in 1990s can be accepted along with some modifications based on the expertopinion at the 2003 Rotterdam conference. In addition to the above classifications,Aziz and colleagues,~(6) in an AES guideline, suggested nine phenotypes incorporating the criteria ofanovulation/oligo-ovulation, clinical hirsutism, biochemical hyperandrogenism andultrasound feature of polycystic ovaries. The Rotterdam criteria were endorsed bythe global PCOS guideline published in 2018. The various diagnostic criteria aresummarised in Table1. Table 1. Diagnostic criteria for PCOS.1990 NIH guidelines:Patient satisfies both criteria:(1) Clinical orbiochemical hyperandrogenism(2) Oligomenorrhoea oroligo-ovulationOther causes of hyperandrogenism andanovulatory subfertility should be excluded.2003 ESHRE/ASRM or Rotterdam guidelines:Patient satisfies two of three criteria:(1)Oligomenorrhoea or oligo-ovulation(2) Clinical orbiochemical hyperandrogenism(3) Polycystic ovaries onultrasoundOther causes of hyperandrogenism andanovulatory subfertility should be excluded.2006 AES guidelines:Patient satisfies both criteria:(1)Hyperandrogenism: hirsutism or biochemicalhyperandrogenism(2) Ovarian dysfunction:oligo-anovulation or polycystic ovariesOther causes ofhyperandrogenism and anovulatory subfertility should beexcluded.Open in a separate windowAES, Androgen Excess Society; ASRM, American Society for ReproductiveMedicine; ESHRE, European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology;NIH, National Institute of Health; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
机译:多囊卵巢综合征是一种常见的内分泌病症,其在繁殖时代的5-10%的妇女中被发现是普遍的。从历史上看,对卵巢卵巢综合征的术语中的术语和雄激素的丙基膦酸过量被认为是一个标志。添加超声特征的卵巢卵巢综合征具有改善了分类卵巢综合征表型的变异的检测。尽管普遍使用了共识验证标准,但多囊卵巢综合征患有几种未解决的争论。难度出现在测量生物化学性高血产病的评估和类型的雌激素的方法中出现的困难,为临床性高原诊断进行截止值,设置嗜睡卵泡数量的超声阈值,并诊断在Adolesthery中的这种情况没有明确“不规则循环”的定义。本文看起来令人享受诊断多囊卵巢综合征的争论。关键词:PCOS,诊断,多囊卵巢综合征introductpolystic卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种常见的内分泌病症,其在生殖年龄组〜(1)中的5-10%妇女中普遍存在普遍存在的内分泌病症中,并且可以在群体之间变化。这是1935年,斯坦伊坦和莱瑟莱尔福尔特描述了这种独特的妇科条件。他们将这种综合征描述了七名妇女,七名妇女结合了肥胖,流氓,脑膜炎和细胞扩大的多囊卵巢。〜(2,3)自集形后,我们对Itsetiology,诊断和治疗的理解有着广阔的发展。在20世纪90年代初期,国家卫生院校(NIH)首先提出了PCOS的诊断标准。它将PCOS定义为寡核酸寡核酸羟基吡喃,雄激素过量统治额外的疏忽不孕症后。〜(4)多囊卵巢的超声标准被认为是“暗示”的PCOS诊断。这些标准是基于共识专家意见,而是来自临床试验的证据。 2003年,欧洲人类产物和胚胎学(eShre)和美国生殖症社会(ASRM)修订了NIH标准,包括多发性卵巢作为第三诊断标准的超声特征。〜(5)如果一个人建立了PCOS的诊断女人遇到了雷丽的两个标准。这是基于观察,即多囊卵益与综合征的生化和临床证据一致的卵子均一致。通过鹿特丹标准的PCOSDIAGNOUD的妇女可以进一步分为四种表型,ATO D,基于诊断的标准。 2006年,雄激素过度的症状(AES)审查了现有数据,并得出结论认为,在20世纪90年代,最初的标准可以接受由2003年鹿特丹会议的专业统计统一体的一些修改。除了上述分类,AZIZ和同事,〜(6)在AES指南中,建议纳入九种表型,包括多囊卵巢的维持/寡核 - 排卵,临床流程主义,生物化学高原andultrasound特征的标准。鹿特丹标准由2018年发布的全球PCOS指南批准。表1中的各种诊断标准仍然存在。表1. PCOS.1990 NIH指南诊断标准在三个标准中:(1)寡聚菌或寡核化毒液(2)临床毒液化高衰老性(3)多囊卵巢泛温卵巢疏松症同性恋者的高衰变和化学性化学性的原因2006 AES指南:患者满足标准:(1)高衰老症:Hirsutism或生物化学性高血压(2)卵巢功能障碍:Oligo-Anoculation或多囊卵巢的Hyperand激发性和助控性化学性的原因应在一个单独的窗口,雄激素过度的社会中开放。 Asrm,美国生殖学会社会;伊尔,欧洲人类繁殖和胚胎学会; NIH,国家健康研究所; PCOS,多囊卵巢综合征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号