...
首页> 外文期刊>Shock and vibration >The Comparative Study on the Damage Zones of Cylindrical and Spherical Charges in Rock and Soil
【24h】

The Comparative Study on the Damage Zones of Cylindrical and Spherical Charges in Rock and Soil

机译:岩土和土壤圆柱和球形损伤区的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

To compare the damage zones of spherical and cylindrical charges in rock and soil, a quasistatic spherical model was established to predict the characteristic dimension of the cavity. The results indicated that the damage zones of cylindrical charges were larger than those of spherical charges. Furthermore, the cavity development of two charges with different shapes was obtained by numerical simulation, and a comparison of the prediction results between the quasistatic model and numerical simulation was made. The comparison showed that the model could predict the damage zones exactly and faster than numerical simulation. Ultimately, the influence of explosions and soil media was discussed by the quasistatic model. It was observed that larger damage zones were generated by smaller values of the product of pressure and exponential expansion. However, the influence of soil media was complex, and larger damage zones were usually generated by the harder soil media.
机译:为了比较岩石和土壤中球形和圆柱电荷的损伤区域,建立了一种Quasistatic球形模型来预测腔的特征尺寸。 结果表明,圆柱电荷的损伤区域大于球形电荷。 此外,通过数值模拟获得两个具有不同形状的电荷的腔开发,并进行了Quasistatic模型与数值模拟之间的预测结果的比较。 比较表明,该模型可以预测损坏区域精确且比数值模拟更快。 最终,通过Quasistatic模型讨论了爆炸和土壤培养基的影响。 观察到,通过压力和指数膨胀乘积的较小值产生较大的损伤区域。 然而,土壤培养基的影响是复杂的,并且通常由较硬的土壤介质产生较大的损伤区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号