首页> 外文期刊>AALL Spectrum >Program C-3: Law Library Collections Post-Microform: Future Implications for the Newest Legacy Format
【24h】

Program C-3: Law Library Collections Post-Microform: Future Implications for the Newest Legacy Format

机译:程序C-3:Microform的法律库集合:对最新遗留格式的未来影响

获取原文
           

摘要

"Law Library Collections Post-Microform" was not set up as a debate between its two key speakers. Terrence McCormack and Jerry Dupont actually agreed on key issues, including the importance of foresight in preservation and the role microforms may play in that process. They both criticized the rash decisionmaking and rushed discard process that leads to the loss of microforms as an archival tool. Although they both spoke to law libraries' future as a place with fewer (or no) microform holdings, they focused on two different aspects of preparing for this future. McCormack addressed what libraries can and should do on their own, and Dupont dealt with how and why libraries should be working with groups like his own Law Library Microform Consortium (LLMC).
机译:“MICROFORM后的法律图书馆集合”未在其两个关键扬声器之间作为争论。 Terrence McCormack和Jerry Dupont实际上同意关键问题,包括远见在保存中的重要性,并且在该过程中可以发挥作用微塑料。 他们都批评了皱疹决策并冲了丢弃的过程,导致微塑料丢失作为档案工具。 虽然它们都与法律图书馆的未来谈到了一个较少(或没有)微塑化的地方,但他们专注于为这一未来做准备的两个不同方面。 McCormack解决了哪些库,应该自己,而且杜邦处理如何以及为什么图书馆应该与他自己的法律图书馆微常规联盟(LLMC)这样的团体合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号