...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >The Dark Side of Relational Leadership: Positive and Negative Reciprocity as Fundamental Drivers of Follower’s Intended Pro-leader and Pro-self Unethical Behavior
【24h】

The Dark Side of Relational Leadership: Positive and Negative Reciprocity as Fundamental Drivers of Follower’s Intended Pro-leader and Pro-self Unethical Behavior

机译:关系领导的黑暗面:积极和消极的互惠作为追随者预期的专业领导者和亲自不道德行为的基本驱动力

获取原文
           

摘要

In this study, we use a social exchange perspective to examine when (i.e., high- vs low-quality leader-member exchange [LMX]), why (i.e., positive vs. negative reciprocity), and how (i.e., pro-leader vs. pro-self unethical behavior) followers consider unethical behavior that either benefits the leader or the self. Across an experimental and a time-split survey study, we find that high-quality LMX relationships motivate pro-leader unethical intention as a means to satisfy positive reciprocity motives, and that low-quality LMX relationships motivate pro-self unethical intention as a means to satisfy negative reciprocity motives. Importantly, our studies demonstrate that it is crucial to incorporate both positive and negative reciprocity motives when studying effects of LMX. Implications of these results for social exchange theory, leader-member exchange, and the broader literature of (self- and other-serving) unethical behavior are discussed.
机译:在这项研究中,我们使用社交交换视角来检查(即高质量的低质量领导者 - 成员交换[LMX]),为什么(即阳性与负互惠),以及如何(即,支持与亲自不道德的行为)追随者认为,不道德的行为是利益领导者或自我。在一个实验和时间分裂调查研究中,我们发现高质量的LMX关系激励受试者的不道德意图作为满足积极互惠动机的手段,并且低质量的LMX关系激励亲自不道德的意图作为一种手段满足消极的互惠动机。重要的是,我们的研究表明,在研究LMX的效果时纳入阳性和负互惠动机至关重要。讨论了这些结果对社会交流理论,领导者交流和更广泛的文学(自我和其他服务)不道德行为的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号