首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Innovation & Knowledge >Inbound open innovation and firm performance
【24h】

Inbound open innovation and firm performance

机译:入境开放创新和公司性能

获取原文
           

摘要

A number of studies focus on the effects of open innovation on firm performance. However, in our view, previous contributions suffer from two main limitations: at first, there is still no homogeneity in the proposition of what “firm performance” is, according to extant literature. In addition, we see a heterogeneity of implications for the relationship between openness and performance, since there is still no consensus among authors on whether the relationship between openness and firm performance is positive, negative or non-linear.We address this issue through an empirical analysis of a cross-national unbalanced panel data of European firms listed in the five major European markets in the years 2008–2013. We seek to sort the impact of the level of inbound openness, derived by the amount invested in internal development versus the external acquisition of intangible assets on firm performance according to three dimensions: economic performance, measured as the amount of firm turnover; firm financial performance, measured with shares value; and human resources performance, measured as the level of employment.Results of panel data regression show that the effects of both internal development and external acquisition are positive and significant across different dimensions, but their output varies in terms in magnitude and distribution both variables are positively and significantly correlated with firm turnover, and that their effect on the latter is almost equal. In addition, we find that only internal development is positively and significantly correlated with the other two dimensions of performance, once we control for firm-specific time trends. Once we control for relative size of firms in the sample, we see that the effect of openness is more spread out across different class sizes, while the effect of internal development of intangibles influences the economic performance only for larger firms, and increases employment only for relatively smaller firms, while it has no effect on the financial side of performance.
机译:许多研究侧重于开放创新对公司性能的影响。然而,在我们看来,以前的贡献遭受了两个主要限制:首先,根据现存文学的“公司性能”的命题仍然没有同质性。此外,我们看到了开放性和性能之间关系的影响,因为作者之间仍然没有共识,因为开放性和公司性能之间的关系是否是积极的,负面或非线性的。我们通过经验解决这个问题2008 - 2013年五大欧洲市场上市的欧洲公司跨国不平衡小组数据分析。我们寻求对入境开放程度的影响分析,通过投资内部开发的金额与外部收购无形资产根据三个维度:经济绩效,衡量为坚定的营业额;坚定的财务表现,以股票价值计量;和人力资源表现,衡量的是就业水平。面板数据回归的结果表明,内部开发和外部采集的影响在不同的尺寸上是正且显着的,但它们的产出在幅度和分布中变化,两个变量都是积极的与坚定的营业额明显相关,并且它们对后者的影响几乎是平等的。此外,我们发现只有内部开发肯定而且与其他两个方面的性能显着相关,一旦我们控制了特定于公司的时间趋势。一旦我们控制样本中的公司的相对大小,我们就会看到开放性的效果在不同班级尺寸上展开,而内在的无形资产的效果仅对较大的公司影响了经济绩效,并仅增加就业相对较小的公司,而它对性能的金融方面没有影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号