首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Oral Science >Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear?
【24h】

Do commercial whitening dentifrices increase enamel erosive tooth wear?

机译:商用美白洁齿剂是否会增加珐琅腐蚀牙齿磨损?

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective This in vitro study evaluated the effect of commercial whitening dentifrices on erosive tooth wear (ETW) of bovine enamel samples, in comparison with commercial regular dentifrices.Methodology Sixty bovine crowns were embedded in acrylic resin, polished and then had their baseline profile determined. They were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=12/group), according to the type of commercial dentifrice to be tested: GI – Crest Anti-cavity Regular; GII – Crest 3D White; GIII – Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint; GIV – Colgate Optic White; GV – Placebo (negative control, fluoride-free dentifrice). The samples were submitted to daily erosive and abrasive challenges for 3 days. The erosive challenges were performed 3 times a day by immersing the specimens in 0.1% citric acid solution (pH 2.5) for 90 s. Each day after the first and last erosive challenges, the specimens were subjected to the abrasive challenge for 15 s, using a toothbrushing machine (Biopdi, S?o Carlos, SP, Brazil), soft toothbrushes and slurry (1:3 g/ml) of the tested toothpastes (1.5 N). The specimens were kept in artificial saliva between the challenges. The final profile was obtained and the ETW (μm) was calculated. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests (p0.05).Results All dentifrices tested significantly reduced the enamel wear in comparison with the Placebo, except GIII. The median (95% CI) ETW was 1.35 (1.25-1.46)bc for GI, 1.17 (1.01-1.34)cd for GII, 1.36 (1.28-1.45)ab for GIII, 1.08 (1.04-1.14)d for GIV and 2.28 (2.18-2.39)a for GV.Conclusion When dentifrices from the same manufacturer were compared, the whitening dentifrices led to similar or less wear than the regular ones.
机译:目的,这种体外研究评估了商业美白洁齿剂对牛搪瓷样品的腐蚀牙齿磨损(ETW)的影响,与商业常规洁齿剂相比。方法嵌入丙烯酸树脂中,抛光,然后测定它们的基线轮廓。根据要测试的商业洁齿剂的类型,将它们随机分配到5组(n = 12 /组):Gi - 嵴防腔常规; GII - 嵴3D白色; GIII - 高露洁总共12个清洁薄荷; GIV - 大康视光白白; GV - 安慰剂(阴性对照,无氟洁绒面)。将样品提交给日常侵蚀和磨蚀性挑战3天。通过将标本浸入0.1%柠檬酸溶液(pH2.5)中,每天进行侵蚀挑战3次。每天在第一和最后一次侵蚀挑战后,使用牙刷机(BIOPDI,S-O Carlos,SP,巴西),软牙刷和浆料(1:3 g / ml,对样品进行磨蚀挑战15秒)测试的牙膏(1.5 n)。这些标本在挑战之间保持人工唾液。获得最终概况并计算EtW(μm)。通过Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn的测试分析了数据(P <0.05)。结果除了GIII之外,所有测试的所有亮度都明显降低了搪瓷磨损。中位数(95%CI)ETW为1.35(1.25-1.46)BC,GII,1.17(1.01-1.34)CD,1.36(1.28-1.45)AB用于GIV,1.08(1.04-1.14)D为GIV和2.28 (2.18-2.39)A for Gv.Conclusion当比较来自同一制造商的亮度时,美白洁齿剂导致相似或更少的磨损而不是常规的。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号