首页> 外文期刊>Development Strategies in Medical Education >Needs assessment of faculty members' educational needs in order to empower them at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences
【24h】

Needs assessment of faculty members' educational needs in order to empower them at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences

机译:需要评估教师的教育需求,以便在Shahrekord医学科学大学授权他们

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Faculty members are considered as basic resources of every university.Therefore, educational needs assessment in order to empower most faculty members is aninseparable part of educational planning.Methods: The study was conducted using a descriptive cross sectional method. The populationconsisted of university professors. About 65% professors participated. The reliability andvalidity of data collection tool, a self-made researcher questionnaire, was approved accordingto different studies. The participants were selected through census method and the results wereanalyzed using SPSS software.Results: The highest priority of the professors in this study included the realms of modernmethods and techniques of teaching (68%), training tips and consultation (62%), methods ofprofessional promotion (61%), academic regulations and rules (58/3%), applying computers ineducation (55%), evidence-based practice (47%), and student assessment methods (43%).Among different academic ranks (p=. / 043) or instructors of basic sciences and clinical sciences(p =. / 053), there was no statistically significant difference between the instructors' preferenceto attend the workshops virtually or in person and they mostly preferred to attend the workshopsin person.Conclusion: Holding educational workshops, considering educational priorities, to empowerprofessors functionally, seems necessary.
机译:简介:教师们是为了赋予最教师认为每university.Therefore的基本资源,教育需求评估是教育planning.Methods aninseparable部分:本研究采用描述性截面法进行。该populationconsisted大学教授。约65%的教授参加了会议。数据收集工具,自制研究员问卷的可靠性andvalidity批准accordingto不同的研究。学员们通过普查方法选择和使用SPSS software.Results结果wereanalyzed:在这项研究中教授的最高优先级包括modernmethods和教学(68%)的技术的领域,训练技巧和咨询(62%),方法ofprofessional推广(61%),学术法规和规章(58/3%),应用计算机ineducation(55%),基于证据的实践(47%),和学生评估方法(43%)。在不同的学术队伍(p =。/ 043)或基础科学和临床科学的指导员(p值=。/ 053),有导师之间没有统计学差异显著出席preferenceto讲习班几乎或亲自与它们大多优选出席workshopsin person.Conclusion :保持教育研讨会,考虑到教育优先,以empowerprofessors功能,似乎有必要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号