首页> 外文期刊>Digital biomarkers. >Usability of a Wrist-Worn Smartwatch in a Direct-to-Participant Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
【24h】

Usability of a Wrist-Worn Smartwatch in a Direct-to-Participant Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial

机译:在直接参与者随机语用临床试验中的手腕磨损的Smartwatch的可用性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The availability of a wide range of innovative wearable sensor technologies today allows for the ability to capture and collect potentially important health-related data in ways not previously possible. These sensors can be adopted in digitalized clinical trials, i.e., clinical trials conducted outside the clinic to capture data about study participants in their day-to-day life. However, having participants activate, charge, and wear the digital sensors for long hours may prove to be a significant obstacle to the success of these trials.Objective:This study explores a broad question of wrist-wearable sensor effectiveness in terms of data collection as well as data that are analyzable per individual. The individuals who had already consented to be part of an asymptomatic atrial fibrillation screening trial were directly sent a wrist-wearable activity and heart rate tracker device to be activated and used in a home-based setting.Methods:A total of 230 participants with a median age of 71 years were asked to wear the wristband as frequently as possible, night and day, for at least a 4-month monitoring period, especially to track heart rhythm during sleep.Results:Of the individuals who received the device, 43% never transmitted any data. Those who used the device wore it a median of ~15 weeks (IQR 2-24) and for 5.3 days (IQR 3.2-6.5) per week. For rhythm detection purposes, only 5.6% of all recorded data from individuals were analyzable (with beat-to-beat intervals reported).Conclusions:This study provides some important learnings. It showed that in an older population, despite initial enthusiasm to receive a consumer-quality wrist-based fitness device, a large proportion of individuals never activated the device. However, it also found that for a majority of participants it was possible to successfully collect wearable sensor data without clinical oversight inside a home environment, and that once used, ongoing wear time was high. This suggests that a critical barrier to overcome when incorporating a wearable device into clinical research is making its initiation of use as easy as possible for the participant.Copyright ? 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
机译:背景:目前各种创新可穿戴传感器技术的可用性允许以先前可能的方式捕获和收集潜在的重要健康相关数据。这些传感器可以在数字化的临床试验中采用,即诊所以外进行的临床试验,以捕获关于学习参与者的数据在日常生活中。然而,让参与者激活,充电和佩戴数字传感器长时间可能被证明是这些试验成功的重要障碍。目的:本研究探讨了数据收集方面的腕带式传感器效果的广泛问题以及每个人可分析的数据。已同意成为无症状心房颤动筛查试验的个人的个人直接送一个腕直行动活动和心率跟踪装置,以激活并用于家庭的设置。方法:共有230名参与者71岁的中位数被要求尽可能频繁地佩戴腕带,晚上和日,至少为期4个月的监测期,特别是在睡眠期间跟踪心律。结果:收到该设备的个人,43%切勿传输任何数据。那些使用该设备的人将其〜15周(IQR 2-24)和5.3天(IQR 3.2-6.5)的中位数佩戴。为了节奏检测目的,分析来自个人的所有记录数据的5.6%(报告的节拍间隔).Conclusions:本研究提供了一些重要的学习。它表明,在较旧的人口中,尽管初步热情来接收到消费物质的腕部的健身装置,但大部分的个体从未激活过设备。然而,它还发现,对于大多数参与者来说,可以在没有家庭环境内没有临床监督,在没有临床监督的情况下成功收集可穿戴的传感器数据,并且曾经使用过,持续的磨损时间很高。这表明在将可穿戴设备掺入临床研究时克服的关键障碍正在使其起始尽可能容易作为参与者.Copyright? 2019年由S. Karger AG,巴塞尔。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号