首页> 外文期刊>Disease models & mechanisms: DMM >Predicting experimental success: a retrospective case-control study using the rat intraluminal thread model of stroke
【24h】

Predicting experimental success: a retrospective case-control study using the rat intraluminal thread model of stroke

机译:预测实验成功:一种利用大鼠腔内线程模型的回顾性案例对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

ABSTRACT The poor translational success rate of preclinical stroke research may partly be due to inaccurate modelling of the disease. We provide data on transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) experiments, including detailed intraoperative monitoring to elaborate predictors indicating experimental success (ischemia without occurrence of confounding pathologies). The tMCAO monitoring data (bilateral cerebral blood flow, CBF; heart rate, HR; and mean arterial pressure, MAP) of 16 animals with an ‘ideal’ outcome (MCA-ischemia), and 48 animals with additional or other pathologies (subdural haematoma or subarachnoid haemorrhage), were checked for their prognostic performance (receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve, AUC). Animals showing a decrease in the contralateral CBF at the time of MCA occlusion suffered from unintended pathologies. Implementation of baseline MAP, in addition to baseline HR (AUC, 0.83, 95% c.i. 0.68 to 0.97), increased prognostic relevance (AUC, 0.89, 95% c.i. 0.79 to 0.98). Prediction performance improved when two additional predictors referring to differences in left and right CBF were considered (AUC, 1.00, 95% c.i. 1.0 to 1.0). Our data underline the importance of peri-interventional monitoring to verify a successful experimental performance in order to ensure a disease model as homogeneous as possible.
机译:摘要临床前卒中研究的不良翻译成功率可能部分是由于疾病的造型不准确。我们提供有关瞬时中脑动脉闭塞(TMCAO)实验的数据,包括详细的术中监测,以制定预测的预测因子,所述预测因子表明实验成功(没有发生混杂病理的缺血)。 TMCAO监测数据(双侧脑血流量,CBF;心率,人力资源,平均动脉压,地图)16只动物的“理想”结果(MCA缺血)和48只动物,具有其他或其他病理(软骨血肿检查或蛛网膜下腔出血)检查其预后性能(接收器操作特性曲线和曲线,AUC下的区域)。在MCA闭塞时显示对侧CBF减少的动物患有意外病理。基线图的实施,除了基线HR(AUC,0.83,95%C.II.0.68至0.97)外,预后相关性增加(AUC,0.89,95%C.i.0.79至0.98)。当考虑左右CBF的差异的两个额外预测因子(AUC,1.00,95%C.i.1.0至1.0)时,预测性能得到改善。我们的数据强调了PERI-S介意监测的重要性,以验证成功的实验性能,以确保尽可能均匀的疾病模型。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号