首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions >Investigating temporal field sampling strategies for site-specific calibration of three soil moisture–neutron intensity parameterisation methods
【24h】

Investigating temporal field sampling strategies for site-specific calibration of three soil moisture–neutron intensity parameterisation methods

机译:调查三种土壤水分中子强度参数化方法的特定现场校准的时间场采样策略

获取原文
           

摘要

The Cosmic-Ray Neutron Sensor (CRNS) can provide soil moisture information at scales relevant to hydrometeorological modelling applications. Site-specific calibration is needed to translate CRNS neutron intensities into sensor footprint average soil moisture contents. We investigated temporal sampling strategies for calibration of three CRNS parameterisations (modified N0, HMF, and COSMIC) by assessing the effects of the number of sampling days and soil wetness conditions on the performance of the calibration results while investigating actual neutron intensity measurements, for three sites with distinct climate and land use: a semi-arid site, a temperate grassland, and a temperate forest. When calibrated with 1 year of data, both COSMIC and the modified N0 method performed better than HMF. The performance of COSMIC was remarkably good at the semi-arid site in the USA, while the N0mod performed best at the two temperate sites in Germany. The successful performance of COSMIC at all three sites can be attributed to the benefits of explicitly resolving individual soil layers (which is not accounted for in the other two parameterisations). To better calibrate these parameterisations, we recommend in situ soil sampled to be collected on more than a single day. However, little improvement is observed for sampling on more than 6 days. At the semi-arid site, the N0mod method was calibrated better under site-specific average wetness conditions, whereas HMF and COSMIC were calibrated better under drier conditions. Average soil wetness condition gave better calibration results at the two humid sites. The calibration results for the HMF method were better when calibrated with combinations of days with similar soil wetness conditions, opposed to N0mod and COSMIC, which profited from using days with distinct wetness conditions. Errors in actual neutron intensities were translated to average errors specifically to each site. At the semi-arid site, these errors were below the typical measurement uncertainties from in situ point-scale sensors and satellite remote sensing products. Nevertheless, at the two humid sites, reduction in uncertainty with increasing sampling days only reached typical errors associated with satellite remote sensing products. The outcomes of this study can be used by researchers as a CRNS calibration strategy guideline.
机译:宇宙射线中子传感器(CRNS)可以在与水样式建模应用相关的秤上提供土壤湿度信息。需要特定于特定的校准,以将CRNS中子强度转化为传感器占地面积平均土壤含水量。我们调查了通过评估采样天数和土壤湿度条件的效果来校准三个CRN参数(修改N0,HMF和宇宙)的时间采样策略,以在调查实际中子强度测量的同时对校准结果的性能进行校准结果的影响具有不同气候和土地利用的遗址:半干旱地点,温带草原和温带森林。校准1年数据时,宇宙和修改的N0方法都比HMF更好。宇宙的表现在美国的半干旱场地非常擅长,而N0Mod在德国的两个温带遗址上表现最佳。在所有三个网站上的宇宙的成功表现可以归因于明确解析各个土壤层的益处(这在其他两个参数化中没有占用)。为了更好地校准这些参数化,我们建议采取原地土壤,以便在一天内收集。但是,在6天内,观察到采样几乎没有改进。在半干旱部位,在特定于场地的平均湿度条件下校准N0Mod方法,而在干燥条件下,HMF和宇宙在更好地校准。平均土壤湿度条件在两个潮湿位点产生了更好的校准结果。当校准HMF方法的校准结果,当用与N0Mod和宇宙相对的天数校准时校准时更好,其利用具有不同湿度条件的天数利用。实际中子强度的错误被转换为每个站点的平均误差。在半干旱地点,这些误差低于原位点刻度传感器和卫星遥感产品的典型测量不确定性。然而,在两个潮湿的部位,增加采样天的不确定性的降低仅达到与卫星遥感产品相关的典型误差。研究人员可以使用该研究的结果作为CRN校准战略指南。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号