首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Public Health >The cost-effectiveness profile of sex-neutral HPV immunisation in European tender-based settings: a model-based assessment
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness profile of sex-neutral HPV immunisation in European tender-based settings: a model-based assessment

机译:欧洲招标环境中性中性HPV免疫的成本效益概况:基于模型的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundIn many European countries, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake among girls has remained below target levels, supporting the scope for vaccination of boys. We aimed to investigate if sex-neutral HPV vaccination can be considered cost-effective compared with girls-only vaccination at uptake levels equal to those among girls and under tender-based vaccination costs achieved throughout Europe.MethodsWe investigated the cost-effectiveness of sex-neutral HPV vaccination in European tender-based settings. We applied a Bayesian synthesis framework for health economic evaluation to 11 countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Estonia, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden), accommodating country-specific information on key epidemiological and economic parameters, and on current HPV vaccination programmes. We used projections from three independently developed HPV transmission models to tailor region-specific herd effects. The main outcome measures in the comparison of sex-neutral with girls-only vaccination were cancer cases prevented and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as the cost in international dollars (I$) per life-year gained.FindingsThe total number of cancer cases to be prevented by vaccinating girls at currently realised vaccine uptake varied from 318 (95% CI 197–405) per cohort of 200?000 preadolescents (100?000 girls plus 100?000 boys) in Croatia (under 20% uptake of the 9-valent vaccine) to 1904 (1741–2101) in Estonia (under 70% uptake of the 9-valent vaccine). Vaccinating boys at equal coverage increased these respective numbers by 168 (95% CI 121–213) in Croatia and 467 (391–587) in Estonia. Sex-neutral vaccination was likely to be cost-effective, with ICERs of sex-neutral compared with girls-only vaccination varying from I$4300 per life-year gained in Latvia (95% credibility interval 3450–5160; 40% uptake) to I$25?720 per life-year gained in Spain (21?380–30?330; 80% uptake). At uniform 80% uptake, a favourable cost-effectiveness profile was retained for most of the countries investigated (Austria, Belgium, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden).InterpretationSex-neutral HPV vaccination is economically attractive in European tender-based settings. However, tendering mechanisms need to ensure that vaccination of boys will remain cost-effective at high vaccine uptake rates.FundingEuropean Commission 7th Framework Programme and WHO.
机译:BackgroundIn许多欧洲国家,女孩的人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的摄取仍低于目标水平,支持对男孩的疫苗接种范围。我们的目的是调查是否性别中立的HPV疫苗可以考虑成本效益与女孩,只摄取水平相比,接种疫苗等于那些女孩子之间以及整个下实现Europe.MethodsWe招标为基础的疫苗接种费用调查性别的成本效益中性HPV疫苗在欧洲招标为基础的环境。我们采用贝叶斯合成的卫生经济学评价框架,11个国家(奥地利,比利时,克罗地亚,爱沙尼亚,意大利,拉脱维亚,荷兰,波兰,斯洛文尼亚,西班牙和瑞典),可容纳上重要的流行病学和经济参数特定国家信息和目前的HPV疫苗接种计划。我们使用从三个独立开发的HPV传输模型预测,以量身定制的区域特定的畜群的影响。在性别中性的女生,只有接种的比较主要成果措施的癌症病例防止和增量成本效益比率(冰剂),定义为每生命年gained.FindingsThe总数在国际美元的费用(I $)通过在接种疫苗目前实现疫苗女孩每200?000青春期的少年(100?000女孩加100?000男孩)队列318(95%CI 197-405)克罗地亚(摄取变化在20%以下的吸收能防止癌症病例爱沙尼亚9价疫苗)至1904(1741年至2101年)的(在70%以下的摄取9价疫苗)。在同等覆盖接种男孩在爱沙尼亚克罗地亚168(95%CI 121-213)和467(391-587)增加了这些相应数目。性别中立的疫苗很可能是成本效益,与冰器性别中立的只有女生接种疫苗改变从我$ 4300每拉脱维亚获得生命年(95%可信区间3450-5160; 40%的吸收)比我$ 25 720每生命年在西班牙(21 380-30 330?80%的吸收)得到了什么?。在统一的80%的吸收,良好的成本效益的个人资料被保留用作大多数国家的调查(奥地利,比利时,意大利,拉脱维亚,荷兰,斯洛文尼亚,西班牙和瑞典).InterpretationSex中性HPV疫苗是欧洲经济吸引力招标为基础的环境。然而,招投标机制需要确保男孩的疫苗接种将保持成本效益高的疫苗吸收rates.FundingEuropean委员会第七框架计划和世界卫生组织。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号