首页> 外文期刊>Pathology oncology research: POR >Do Different Stemness Markers Identify Different Pools of Cancer Stem Cells in Malignancies: A Study on ER+ and ER-Breast Cancer Cell Lines
【24h】

Do Different Stemness Markers Identify Different Pools of Cancer Stem Cells in Malignancies: A Study on ER+ and ER-Breast Cancer Cell Lines

机译:不同的茎标记物识别恶性肿瘤中的不同癌症干细胞:对ER +和ER-乳腺癌细胞系的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In view of popularity of cancer stem cell (CSC) model all events in evolution of cancer are being explained in that context. Breast cancer is first solid tumor in which CSCs were identified. We aimed to compare stemness profile of two major subtypes [Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and negative (ER )] breast cancer using different sets of markers. Expression of CD44/CD24, CK/Vimentin, E-Cadherin/Fibronectin and percentage of side population (SP) was studied in ER+ (T47D) and ER (MDA-MB-231) cell lines by flow cytometry. Breast CSCs (BCSCs) were sorted using CD44+/CD24 /low expressionand SP analysis and cultured. BCSCs were then compared with Non-CSCs (NCSCs) for response to drugs (Paclitaxel and Cisplatin), Ki67 and ER expression. Results showed higher expression of stemness markers (CD44+/CD24 /low, CK+/Vimentin+ and E-Cadherin /FibrinectinF+) in MDA-MB-231 cells. Percentage SP representing BCSCs was found to be significantly more in later (3.20 0.002 cf. T47D 1.25% 0.0007). BCSCs were found to be more resistant to drugs as compared to NCSCs in both cell lines. ER expression was weak in BCSCs sorted from T47D as compared to NCSCs. Ki67 was expressed in both BCSCs and NCSCs. Differences in expression of stemness markers help to explain aggressive behavior, higher recurrence rate and metastatic potential of MDA-MB-231 cells. However, no correlation amongst different markers used suggests that they may be identifying varied populations of cells in tumor hierarchy. A weak ER expression in BCSCs may be strategy used by BCSCs to escape effect of hormone therapy in ER+ breast cancers.
机译:鉴于癌症干细胞的普及(CSC)模型,在这种情况下,正在解释癌症演变中的所有事件。乳腺癌是第一种固体肿瘤,其中鉴定了CSC。我们的旨在使用不同的标记组比较两种主要亚型[雌激素受体阳性(ER +)和负(ER)]乳腺癌的茎突。通过流式细胞术,在ER +(T47D)和ER(MDA-MB-231)细胞系中研究了CD44 / CD24,CK / Vimentin,E-CDADHERIN /纤连蛋白和侧群(SP)的百分比。使用CD44 + / CD24 /低表达和SP分析和培养分选乳腺CSCs(BCSCs)。然后将BCSCs与非CSCs(NCSCs)进行比较,以应对药物(紫杉醇和顺铂),Ki67和ER表达。结果表明,MDA-MB-231细胞中茎秆标记物(CD44 + / CD24 /低,CK + / Vimentin +和E-Cadherin /纤维蛋白/纤维蛋白/纤维蛋白纤维蛋白纤维蛋白纤维蛋白纤维蛋白纤维蛋白纤维蛋白切入率高。发现代表BCSCs的SP百分比在后期内明显更多(3.20 0.002 CF.T47D 1.25%0.0007)。与两种细胞系中的NCSC相比,发现BCSCs对药物更耐药。与NCSCs相比,ER表达在从T47D中排序的BCSC中弱。 KI67在BCSCS和NCSC中表达。茎秆标志物表达的差异有助于解释MDA-MB-231细胞的攻击性行为,更高的复发率和转移潜力。然而,使用不同的标记中没有相关的相关性表明它们可以识别肿瘤等级中的多种细胞群。 BCSCs中的弱ER表达可以是BCSCs用于逃避er +乳腺癌中激素治疗的效果的策略。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号