...
首页> 外文期刊>Pathology oncology research: POR >Comparison of Native Aspirates and Cytological Smears Obtained by EUS-Guided Biopsies for Effective DNA/RNA Marker Testing in Pancreatic Cancer
【24h】

Comparison of Native Aspirates and Cytological Smears Obtained by EUS-Guided Biopsies for Effective DNA/RNA Marker Testing in Pancreatic Cancer

机译:通过EUS引导活组织检查在胰腺癌中获得有效DNA / RNA标记试验获得的本机吸气和细胞学涂片的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

We compare two types of pancreatic carcinoma samples obtained by EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in terms of the success rates and clinical validity of analysis of two most commonly investigated DNA/RNA pancreatic cancer markers, KRAS mutations and miR-21 expression. 118 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent EUS-FNB. The collected sample was divided, one part was stored in a stabilizing solution as native aspirate (EUS-FNA) and second part was processed into the cytological smear (EUS-FNC). DNA/RNA extraction was followed by analysis of KRAS mutations and miR-21 expression. For both sample types, the yields of DNA/RNA extraction and success rates of KRAS mutation and miRNA expression were evaluated. Finally, the resulting KRAS mutation frequency and miR-21 prognostic role were compared to literature data from tissue resections. The overall amount of isolated DNA/RNA from EUS-FNC was lower compared to the EUS-FNA, average yield 10ng vs 147ng for DNA and average yield 164 vs. 642ng for RNA, but the success rates for KRAS and miR-21 analysis was 100% for both sample types. The KRAS-mutant detection frequency in EUS-FNC was 12% higher than in EUS-FNA (90 vs 78%). The prognostic role of miR-21 was confirmed in EUS-FNC (p= 0.02), but did not reach statistical significance in EUS-FNA (p= 0.06). Although both types of EUS-FNB samples are suitable for DNA/RNA extraction and subsequent DNA mutation and miRNA expression analysis, reliable results with clinical validity were only obtained for EUS-FNC.
机译:我们的成功率和两个最常研究的DNA / RNA胰腺癌标志物,KRAS突变和miR-21的分析的临床有效性方面比较两种超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNB)得到的胰腺肿瘤样本表达。 118例胰腺导管腺癌接受EUS-FNB。所收集的样品被划分,一部分储存在稳定溶液作为本机抽吸(EUS-FNA)和第二部分被加工成细胞学涂片(EUS-SID)。 DNA / RNA提取,随后KRAS突变和miR-21表达的分析。对于这两种类型的样品,的KRAS突变和miRNA表达的DNA / RNA提取和成功率的产率进行了评价。最后,将得到的KRAS突变频率和miR-21的预后的作用进行了比较,从组织切除文献数据。分离的DNA的总量/从EUS-FNC的RNA下相比,EUS-FNA,平均产量为10ng VS 147ng DNA和平均产量164与642ng用于RNA,但对于KRAS和miR-21的分析的成功率分别为100%两种类型的样品。在EUS-FNC的KRAS突变的检测频率比在EUS-FNA(90比78%)高12%。 miR-21的的预后的作用被证实在EUS-FNC(P = 0.02),但在EUS-FNA(P = 0.06)没有达到统计学显着性。尽管这两种类型的EUS-FNB样品的适合于DNA / RNA提取和随后的DNA突变和miRNA表达分析,EUS-FNC只获得具有临床有效性可靠的结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号