...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Medical Education >Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting
【24h】

Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting

机译:案例呈现方法:在受控设置中的一分钟前列的一分钟备线与SNAPP的随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

One-minute preceptor (OMP) and SNAPPS (a mnemonic for Summarize history and findings; Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe the preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; and Select case-related issues for self-study) are educational techniques developed to promote learners expression of clinical reasoning during the case presentation in the workplace. The aim of this present study was to compare the content of the case presentation between the SNAPPS and the OMP methods. This was a randomized controlled trial comparing SNAPPS and OMP in 60 medical students at the beginning of their fifth year of medical school. After an introduction session, students presented and discussed two cases based on real patients and provided in written format. All case presentations were recorded and evaluated by two researchers. The assessed elements of the case presentations were divided into three subgroups related to expression of clinical reasoning, time and initiative to guide the presentation. There were 30 participants in each group. There was no difference in the expression of clinical reasoning between OMP and SNAPPS groups (number of differential diagnoses, justification of most likely diagnosis and differential diagnosis, expression of comparing and contrasting hypotheses). However, students in the SNAPPS group expressed significantly more questions and uncertainties (p 0.001), and more often took the initiative to present and justify the most likely diagnosis, differential diagnosis and management plan than students in the OMP group, both in simple and complex cases (all p values 0.001) without extending the length of the teaching session. OMP and SNAPPS equally promote medical students expression of clinical reasoning. The SNAPPS technique was more effective than the OMP technique in helping students to take on an active role during case presentation. We propose SNAPPS as an effective learning tool, engaging students and promoting the expression of their clinical reasoning as part of a case presentation.
机译:一分钟的预先(OMP)和SNAPP(总结历史和发现的助记符;差别差分;分析差异;探讨了不确定因素的预先探讨;计划管理;并选择与自学的案例相关问题)是教育技术促进学习者在工作场所介绍期间表达临床推理。本研究的目的是比较SNAPP和OMP方法之间的情况呈现的内容。这是一项随机对照试验,比较SNAPPS和60名医学院的OMP在第五年的医学院开始。在介绍会话之后,学生介绍并讨论了基于真实患者的两种病例,并以书面形式提供。所有案例演示都被两位研究人员记录和评估。案件介绍的评估元素分为与表达临床推理,时间和倡议的三个亚组,以指导介绍。每组有30名参与者。 OMP和SNAPPS组(差异诊断数量,最可能诊断和鉴别诊断,比较和对比假设的表达)的临床推理表达没有差异。然而,SNAPPS集团的学生表达了更多的问题和不确定性(P <0.001),而且更常常提出并证明最可能的诊断,差异诊断和管理计划,而不是OMP组,这两者都简单而且复杂案例(所有P值<0.001),无需延长教学会话的长度。 OMP和SNAPPS同样促进医学生的表达临床推理。 SNAPP技术比在帮助学生在案例介绍期间接受积极作用的OMP技术更有效。我们将SNAPP作为一个有效的学习工具,从事学生并促进其临床推理的表达,作为案例介绍的一部分。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号