首页> 外文期刊>Open Access Library Journal >Synchronous Versus Asynchronous: Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance in Science Formative Assessment Tests
【24h】

Synchronous Versus Asynchronous: Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance in Science Formative Assessment Tests

机译:同步与异步:售前教师在科学形成性评估测试中的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of the study was to assess the performance of pre-service teachers in three science formative assessment tests in an online learning environment. The participants consisted of 138 pre-service teachers (57 participated in synchronous session and 81 participated in asynchronous sessions). The study used a quasi-experimental design, non-equivalent groups post-test only. Tests were used to collect the data: Energy Concept Test (ECT), Teaching Energy Concept Test (TECT) and Basic Electronics Concept Test (BECT). ANOVA results revealed a significant effect of type of test on test scores of students at the p < 0.05 level for the three tests [F (2, 364) = 9.641, p = 0.000]. For the ECT, there was no significant difference in performance between synchronous group (M = 15.93, SD = 3.098) and asynchronous group (M = 14.75, SD = 3.691), t (1.791) p = 0.076. For the TECT, there was no significant difference in performance between synchronous group (M = 13.55, SD = 4.069) and asynchronous group (M = 13.97, SD = 3.312), t (-0.596) p = 0.553. Also, for the BECT, there was no significant difference between synchronous group (M = 16.53, SD = 2.727) and asynchronous group (M = 15.19, SD = 3.725), t (2.287) p = 0.024. Pre-service teachers’ performance in the three tests was higher than average. Online learning is an effective medium for teaching and learning of science and can be analogous to face-to-face instruction. Both synchronous and asynchronous environments prove effective for teaching and learning science.
机译:该研究的目的是评估在线学习环境中三种科学形成性评估测试中的服务前教师的表现。参与者由138名预先服务教师(57参加同步会话和81参加异步会话)。该研究使用了准实验设计,仅在测试后的非等效组。测试用于收集数据:能量概念测试(ECT),教学能源概念测试(TECT)和基本电子概念测试(BECT)。 ANOVA结果显示了对三次测试的P <0.05级别的学生测试评分的测试类型的显着影响[F(2,364)= 9.641,P = 0.000]。对于ECT,同步组(M = 15.93,SD = 3.098)和异步组之间的性能没有显着差异(M = 14.75,SD = 3.691),T(1.791)P = 0.076。对于Tect,同步组之间的性能没有显着差异(M = 13.55,SD = 4.069)和异步组(M = 13.97,SD = 3.312),T(-0.596)p = 0.553。此外,对于Bect,同步组(M = 16.53,SD = 2.727)和异步组之间没有显着差异(M = 15.19,SD = 3.725),T(2.287)P = 0.024。三项测试中的服务前教师的表现高于平均水平。在线学习是一种有效的教学和学习科学的培养基,可以类似于面对面的教学。同步和异步环境都证明了教学和学习科学的有效性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号