首页> 外文期刊>Open Access Library Journal >Separation of Judiciary and Judicial Independence in Bangladesh: An Appraisal
【24h】

Separation of Judiciary and Judicial Independence in Bangladesh: An Appraisal

机译:孟加拉国司法和司法独立的分离:评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Judiciary is not only confined to be an organ like executive and legislature but also something more. It is the last hope and aspiration to restore the rights of citizen in a country. But this judiciary cannot act to restore these rights unless and until it is free from any undue influence and interference of any other organ. Therefore, it is an obvious need that the judiciary should be separated in the true sense to perform its functions independently which is the main object of the judiciary. And where there is no effective separation of judiciary, there is no independent judiciary and where there is no independent judiciary, there is no rule of law. But mere separation is not enough to perform its function effectively. This paper will analyze the terms separation of judiciary and judicial independence and evaluate their proper implementation in Bangladesh and also some other factors which are essential with the separation of the judiciary to ensure independence. In Bangladesh, Judiciary has been separated from the executive in 2007. But due to some theoretical problems in justice system, the practice of executive interferences over judiciary is still continuing in Bangladesh in some context. “Judicial independence” is the concept that the judiciary needs to be kept away from the other branches of government. And the “separation of judiciary” is the pre-condition to judicial independence. To make concept of the research clear at first some terms should be made clear. Judicial independence refers to the separation of judiciary and independence of judiciary. Separation of the judiciary from the executive is established by the constitution of Bangladesh from its origin. But it was limited to mere documentary recognition before the decision of Masdar Hossain case in 2007 through which the separation of judiciary as well judicial independence was established in true sense. But it is not clear whether the judicial independence is actually implicated in proper way. To establish the proper judicial system, the separation of judiciary is a vital issue.
机译:司法机构不仅限于行政和立法机库,而且还有更多的东西。它是恢复一个国家公民权利的最后希望和渴望。但除非另外,此司法机构不能采取恢复这些权利,直到它没有任何其他机构的任何不当影响和干涉。因此,这是一个明显的需要,司法机构应该在真正的意义上分开,以独立地执行其功能,这是司法机构的主要对象。在没有有效的司法机构分离的地方,没有独立的司法机构,没有独立的司法机构,没有法治。但仅仅分离不足以有效地执行其功能。本文将分析司法和司法独立的术语和司法独立性的术语,并评估他们在孟加拉国的适当实施,以及与司法机构分开以确保独立性的其他因素是必不可少的。在孟加拉国,司法机构于2007年分开了行政官。但由于司法系统的一些理论问题,在一些背景下,司法机构执行干扰的实践仍在继续孟加拉国。 “司法独立”是司法机构需要远离政府的其他分支机构所需的概念。 “司法部门的分离”是司法独立的预先条件。首先,应清楚地提出研究的概念。司法独立是指司法机构的分离和司法机构的独立性。孟加拉国宪法从其起源建立了司法机构的分离。但是仅限于2007年在马斯达尔Hossain案件决定之前仅仅是司法独立的决定,以真实意义建立了司法独立性的分离。但目前尚不清楚司法独立是否实际上以适当的方式涉及。为了建立适当的司法制度,司法机构的分离是一个重要问题。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号