首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory Research >“Can do, don’t do” are not the lazy ones: a longitudinal study on physical functioning in patients with COPD
【24h】

“Can do, don’t do” are not the lazy ones: a longitudinal study on physical functioning in patients with COPD

机译:“可以做,不做”不是懒惰的:纵向研究COPD患者身体功能

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background and objective Reduced physical capacity (PC) and physical activity (PA) are common in COPD patients and associated with poor outcome. However, they represent different aspects of physical functioning and interventions do not affect them in the same manner. To address this, a new PC-PA quadrant concept was recently generated to identify clinical characteristics of sub-groups of physical functioning. The objective of this study was to I) proof the new concept and to verify their differentiating clinical characteristics, II) evaluate the consistency of the concept over time, III) assess whether patients changed their quadrant affiliation over time, IV) and to test if changes in quadrant affiliations are associated with changes in clinical characteristics. Methods In a longitudinal, prospective, non-interventional cohort with mild to very severe COPD patients, PC and PA as well as respiratory variables, COPD-specific health status, comorbidities, survival, and exacerbations were yearly assessed. Results Data from 283 patients were analysed at baseline. Mean (min/max) follow-up time was 2.4 (0.5/6.8) years. The PC-PA quadrants could be characterized as follows: I) “can’t do, don’t do”: most severe and symptomatic, several comorbidities II) “can do, don’t do”: severe but less symptomatic, several comorbidities III) “can’t do, do do”: few patients, severe and symptomatic, less comorbidities IV) “can do, do do”: mildest and less symptomatic, less comorbidities, lowest exacerbation frequency. Of the 172 patients with at least one follow-up, 58% patients never changed their quadrant affiliation, while 17% declined either PC, PA or both, 11% improved their PC, PA or both, and 14% showed improvement and decline in PC, PA or both during study period. None of the clinical characteristics or their annual changes showed consistent significant and relevant differences between all individual sub-groups. Conclusion Our findings suggest that there are no clinical characteristics allowing to distinguish between the PC-PA quadrants and the concept seems not able to illustrate disease process. However, the already low PA but preserved PC in the “can do, don’t do” quadrant raises the question if regularly assessment of PA in clinical practice would be more sensitive to detect progressive deterioration of COPD compared to the commonly used PC. Clinical trial registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01527773.
机译:摘要背景和目的减少的物理能力(PC)和体育活动(PA)在COPD患者中是常见的,并且与差的结果相关。然而,它们代表物理运行的不同方面,干预不会以相同的方式影响它们。为了解决这个问题,最近产生了一个新的PC-PA象限概念,以确定物理运行子组的临床特征。本研究的目的是i)证明新概念并验证他们的临床特征,ii)评估概念随时间,iii的一致性,评估患者是否会随着时间的推移改变象限的陪审,并测试象限附属的变化与临床特征的变化有关。方法在纵向,前瞻性,非介入的群体,轻度到非常严重的COPD患者,PC和PA以及呼吸变量,COPD特异性健康状况,组合,存活率和加剧。结果283例患者的数据在基线上分析。平均(最小/最大)随访时间为2.4(0.5 / 6.8)年。 PC-PA象限可以表征如下:i)“不能做,不做”:最严重和症状,几个合并症II)“可以做,不做”:严重但症状较少,几个同型III)“不能做,做”:少数患者,严重和症状,较少的合并症IV)“可以做,确实”:令人满意,症状,较少的合并症,最低的加剧频率。在172名至少有一个后续后续后的患者中,58%的患者从未改变过象限的衔接,而17%的患者拒绝了PC,PA或两者,11%改善了他们的PC,PA或两者,14%显示出改善和下降在研究期间PC,PA或两者。临床特征和年度变化都没有表现出所有个体子组之间的一致性和相关差异。结论我们的研究结果表明,没有临床特征,允许区分PC-PA象限和该概念似乎无法说明疾病过程。然而,如果在临床实践中定期评估PA在临床实践中定期评估PA对PA在普通使用的PC相比,如果在临床实践中定期评估PA更敏感,则在“可以做”中的PA,象限的象限已经提高了这个问题。临床试验登记www.clinicaltrials.gov,nct01527773。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号