...
首页> 外文期刊>Reading & Writing >Why the English Home Language Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement will not improve learners’ reading comprehension
【24h】

Why the English Home Language Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement will not improve learners’ reading comprehension

机译:为什么英语家庭语言课程和评估政策声明将不会提高学习者阅读理解

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), and similar international assessments, have consistently shown South African intermediate phase learners’ performance to be among the lowest worldwide. Of particular concern is the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) for Home Language in the Intermediate Phase and, specifically, the document’s treatment of the assessment of reading comprehension. Objectives: In this study, the CAPS requirements for assessing reading comprehension were examined, with the aim of laying the groundwork for an improved policy framework. Method: The research design of the study involved evaluating the assessment of reading comprehension in the CAPS document, using a social realist approach to uncover its underlying structures and mechanisms. Results: The study found that a principled approach to the assessment of reading comprehension was lacking, which had a cumulative effect across the CAPS document, resulting in random, yet highly prescriptive, requirements. Conclusion: The study concluded that CAPS does not provide adequate guidance for improving reading comprehension and, moreover, that the prescribed programme of assessment is not supported by the research literature on reading comprehension. The study recommends that better, more evidence-informed and consultative policies and guidelines be introduced to support teachers in the assessment – and, ultimately, the improvement – of intermediate phase learners’ reading comprehension.
机译:背景:国际阅读识字研究(皮肤)和类似的国际评估进展一致地表现出南非中期阶段学习者的表现,成为全球最低的绩效。特别关注的是中期阶段的家庭语言课程和评估政策声明(CAP),具体而言,该文件的待遇对阅读理解的评估。目的:在本研究中,研究了评估阅读理解的提议要求,目的是为改进的政策框架奠定基础。方法:研究设计涉及评估CAPS文件中阅读理解的评估,利用社会现实主义方法揭示其潜在结构和机制。结果:该研究发现,缺乏对阅读理解的评估的原则方法,这对CAPS文件进行了累积效果,导致随机,但高度规范,要求。结论:这项研究得出结论,CAPS没有提供适当的指导,以改善阅读理解,而且,研究文献对阅读理解的研究文献不支持规定的评估计划。该研究建议在评估中提高更好,更有证据知情和咨询政策和准则,以支持教师 - 以及最终改善中期学习者阅读理解的改进。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号