首页> 外文期刊>Nurse Media: Journal of Nursing >Peer Learning: An Effective Teaching-Learning Method for Improving Ability in Arterial Blood Gases Interpretation
【24h】

Peer Learning: An Effective Teaching-Learning Method for Improving Ability in Arterial Blood Gases Interpretation

机译:同行学习:一种改善动脉血气解释能力的有效教学方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Competent nurses are expected to be able to interpret arterial blood gases (ABGs). The benefits of peer learning, an innovative teaching-learning method today, have long been recognized. However, to date, no studies have compared the effect of this method and the traditional classical method in interpreting ABGs.?Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effect of peer learning and classical learning methods on the nurses’ ability to interpret ABGs.?Method: This was a quasi-experimental research with pre and post-test design. Forty ward nurses were invited in the peer learning method group, and another 40 ward nurses were invited in the classical learning method group through a randomization process. Data were collected using a questionnaire before and after the educational intervention. The classical class was taught by an experienced trainer, while peer groups, divided into groups of 5-6, were taught by one member of each group who obtained the best pre-test score and received special training first. The analysis of data was performed by t-test.Result: The result showed that after the intervention, the mean score of interpreting ABGs in the peer learning group increased by 3.18±1.12 (p0.001), while in the classical learning method, it only increased by 2.32±0.988 (p0.001). Although there were significant increases in ABGs analysis’s ability in both groups, the peer teaching-learning group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in interpreting ABGs (p0.001).Conclusion: The peer learning method facilitates a more significant improvement in the nurses’ ability for ABGs interpretation. Peer learning is appropriate as one of the methods in clinical education for nurses.
机译:背景:预计有能力的护士将能够解释动脉血液(ABG)。同行学习的好处,今天的创新教学方法,长期以来一直被认可。然而,迄今为止,没有研究比较了这种方法的效果和传统的古典方法在解释ABGS中的效果。这个研究旨在比较同伴学习和古典学习方法对护士解释ABG的能力的影响。方法:这是对预测试设计的准实验研究。在同行学习方法组中邀请了四十个病房护士,通过随机化过程邀请了另外40个病房护士。在教育干预之前和之后使用调查问卷收集数据。经过经验丰富的培训师,古典课程被教导,而同行团体分为5-6人,由每个集团的一名成员授权,他们首先获得了最佳的预测分数并获得了特殊培训。通过T-Test.Result进行数据进行分析:结果表明,在干预后,对等学习组中解释ABG的平均得分提高了3.18±1.12(P <0.001),而在经典学习方法中,它仅增加2.32±0.988(P <0.001)。虽然ABGS分析在两组中的能力存在显着增加,但同行教学组在解释ABG方面表现出显着提高的改善(P <0.001)。结论:同行学习方法有助于对护士的能力更加显着改善ABGS解释。同行学习是作为护士临床教育中的方法之一。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号