...
首页> 外文期刊>NeoBiota >How dense is dense? Toward a harmonized approach to characterizing reefs of non-native Pacific oysters – with consideration of native mussels
【24h】

How dense is dense? Toward a harmonized approach to characterizing reefs of non-native Pacific oysters – with consideration of native mussels

机译:密集是多么密集?朝着对非本土牡蛎的特征珊瑚礁的统一方法 - 考虑到原生贻贝

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Pacific oysters Crassostrea (Magallana) gigas have been successfully invading ecosystems worldwide. As an ecosystem engineer, they have the potential to substantially impact on other species and on functional processes of invaded ecosystems. Engineering strength depends on oyster density in space and time. Density has not yet been studied on the extent of reef structural dynamics. This study assessed abundance of naturalized Pacific oysters by shell length (SL) of live individuals and post-mortem shells at six sites over six consecutive years during post-establishment. Individual biomass, i.e. live wet mass (LWM), flesh mass (FM) and live shell mass (SM LIVE), were determined from a total of 1.935 live oysters in order to estimate areal biomass. The generic term density attribute was used for SL-related population categories and the biomass variables LWM, FM, SM LIVE and SM. As the oyster invasion modulated resident Mytilus edulis beds, the study was supplemented by contemporaneously assessed data of mussels and corresponding analyses.Interrelations of abundance and areal biomass revealed distinct linkages between specific density attributes. Most importantly, large individuals were identified as intrinsic drivers for the determination of areal biomass. Additionally, allometry of large oysters differed from small oysters by attenuated scaling relations. This effect was enhanced by oyster density as results showed that crowding forced large individuals into an increasing slender shape. The significant relationship between the density attributes large oyster and biomass enabled a classification of reef types by large oyster abundance. Reef type (simple or complex reef) and oyster size (small or large) were considered by implementing a novel concept of weighted twin functions (TF) for the relationship between SL and individual biomass. This study demonstrates that the interplay of scaling parameters (scalar, exponent) is highly sensitive to the estimation of individual biomass (shape) and that putative similar scaling parameters can exceedingly affect the estimation of areal biomass.For the first time, this study documents the crucial relevance of areal reference, i.e. cluster density (CD) or reef density (RD), when comparing density. RD considers reef areas devoid of oysters and results from CD reduced by reef coverage (RC) as the relative reef area occupied by oysters. A compilation of density attributes at simple and complex reefs shall serve as a density guide. Irrespective of areal reference, oyster structural density attributes were significantly higher at complex than at simple reefs. In contrast, areal reference was of vital importance when evaluating the impact of engineering strength at ecosystem-level. While mussel CD was similar at both reef types, RD at complex reefs supported significantly more large mussels and higher mussel biomass than at simple reefs. Although mussels dominated both reef types by abundance of large individuals, oysters were the keystone engineers by dominating biomass.The prominent status of large oysters for both allometric scaling and density, presumably characteristic for Pacific oyster populations worldwide, should be considered when conducting future investigations. The effort of monitoring will substantially be reduced as only large oysters have to be counted for an empirical characterization of Pacific oyster reefs. The large oyster concept is independent of sampling season, assessment method or ecosystem, and is also applicable to old data sets. Harmonization on the proposed density attributes with a clear specification of areal reference will allow trans-regional comparisons of Pacific oyster reefs and will facilitate evaluations of engineering strength, reef performance and invasional impacts at ecosystem-level.
机译:太平洋牡蛎鲫鱼(Magallana)Gigas一直成功地侵入全球生态系统。作为生态系统工程师,他们有可能对其他物种和侵袭生态系统的功能过程产生显着影响。工程强度取决于空间和时间的牡蛎密度。尚未研究珊瑚礁结构动态的程度尚未研究密度。本研究通过在建立后连续六年连续六个阶段,通过活闭个体和验尸壳的外壳长度(SL)评估了甲壳长度(SL)的归化太平洋牡蛎。单独的生物量,即Live Wet Mass(LWM),肉体质量(FM)和活壳质量(SM Live)由总共1.935个活牡蛎确定,以估计面积生物质。通用术语密度属性用于与SL相关的人口类别和生物量变量LWM,FM,SM Live和SM。由于牡蛎入侵调制常驻植物豆类蚊帐,该研究通过同期评估的贻贝数据和相应的分析进行了补充。丰度和面积生物量的特性揭示了特定密度属性的明显键。最重要的是,将大型人确定为确定区域生物质的内在驱动因素。另外,通过减弱的缩放关系,大牡蛎的各种牡蛎不同于小牡蛎。随着牡蛎密度的增强,这种效果随着结果表明,拥挤迫使大体迫使大体变为增加的细长形状。密度属性与大牡蛎和生物量之间的显着关系使大型牡蛎丰富的珊瑚礁类型的分类。通过实施SL和单独生物质之间的关系,通过实施加权双函数(TF)的新颖概念来考虑Reef Type(简单或复杂的珊瑚礁)和牡蛎尺寸(小或大)。本研究表明,缩放参数(标量,指数)的相互作用对单个生物量(形状)的估计非常敏感,并且推定的类似缩放参数可能超出面积生物质的估计。这项研究文件首次文献在比较密度时,所以参考,即聚类密度(CD)或珊瑚礁密度(RD)的关键相关性。 RD考虑了牡蛎的珊瑚礁地区,并通过珊瑚礁覆盖率(RC)减少的CD结果,因为牡蛎占据的相对珊瑚礁区域。在简单和复杂的珊瑚礁上的密度属性汇编应用作密度指南。无论面制参考如何,牡蛎结构密度属性都比在简单的珊瑚礁上显着更高。相比之下,在评估生态系统级的工程强度的影响时,所以引用至关重要。虽然贻贝CD在两种珊瑚礁类型中相似,但复杂礁石的RD支持明显大的贻贝和比简单珊瑚礁更高的贻贝生物量。虽然贻贝以大量的大个人占据了珊瑚礁类型,但牡蛎是通过支配生物量的梯形工程师。在进行未来的调查时,应考虑到全世界的各种缩放和密度的大型牡蛎的突出地位,可能会考虑到全世界的太平洋牡蛎群体。监测的努力将大大减少,因为只有大型牡蛎必须计算太平洋牡蛎珊瑚礁的经验表征。大型牡蛎概念独立于采样季,评估方法或生态系统,也适用于旧数据集。拟议密度属性的协调具有明确规范的区域参考规范将允许对太平洋牡蛎珊瑚礁的跨区域比较,并将促进工程实力的评估,珊瑚礁绩效和生态系统级别的兴奋。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号