首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Effect of RTS versus percutaneous conventional pedicle screw fixation on type A thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Effect of RTS versus percutaneous conventional pedicle screw fixation on type A thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective cohort study

机译:RTS与经皮传统椎弓根螺钉固定对胸瘤骨折的影响:回顾性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aims at evaluating the effects of RTS (rotation softened trauma fixation system) compared with PCPSF (percutaneous conventional pedicle screw fixation) on type A thoracolumbar fractures. In this retrospective cohort study, 116 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures from March 2014 to June 2018 were enrolled. PCPSF was performed in 60 patients, meanwhile the other 56 patients accepted RTS. VAS scores, Cobb angle, anterior vertebral height (AVH) and perioperative data were compared between the two groups. Both groups were consistent with baseline on demographic and clinical characteristics. No significant difference was observed in VAS score between-group before and after operation. One year after surgery, the VAS score of RTS group was lower than that of PCPSF group (0.7 0.3 vs. 1.5 0.4). The postoperative AVH (%) in PCPSF was 82.3% (95%CI, 81.7 84.6), and 91.78% (95% CI, 91.1 92.4) in RTS. The postoperative improvement rate of AVH (%) in RTS was higher than that in PCPSF (30.6 5.0 [95% CI, 29.2 32.0] vs. 22.0 7.3 [95% CI, 20.2 24.2]). The postoperative Cobb angle ( ) in PCPSF was 2.6 3.4 (95%CI,11.7 13.5), and 7.5 2.0 (95%CI,7.0 8.0) in RTS. The postoperative correction of Cobb angle ( ) in RTS was higher than that in PCPSF (16.1 3.8 95%CI,15.1 17.1] vs. 11.6 5.2 95%CI,10.3 13.1]). Compared with PCPSF, RTS has advantages in restoring the anterior vertebral height and reducing local kyphosis.
机译:本研究旨在评估RTS(旋转软化创伤系统)的影响与胸腰椎骨折的PCPSF(经皮常规椎弓根螺钉固定)相比。在这项回顾性的队列研究中,2014年3月至2018年6月,116名型胸瘤骨折患者入学。 PCPSF在60名患者中进行,同时其他56名患者接受了RTS。在两组之间比较了VAS分数,COBB角度,前椎体高度(AVH)和围手术期数据。两组与人口统计学特征的基线一致。在术前和之后,在组之间的VAS评分中没有观察到显着差异。手术后一年,RTS组的VAS得分低于PCPSF组(0.7 0.3与1.5 0.4)。 PCPSF的术后AVH(%)为82.3%(95%CI,81.7 84.6),RTS中为91.78%(95%CI,91.1 92.4)。 RTS中的AVH(%)的术后改善率高于PCPSF(30.6 5.0 [95%CI,29.2 32.0]与22.0 7.3 [95%CI,20.2 24.2])。 PCPSF中的术后COBB角()为2.6 3.4(95%CI,11.7 13.5)和RTS中的7.5 2.0(95%CI,7.0.0)。 RTS中COBB角()的术后校正高于PCPSF(16.1.8 95%CI,15.117.1]与11.6 5.2 95%CI,10.3 13.1])。与PCPSF相比,RTS在恢复前椎体高度并减少局部脊柱病方面具有优势。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号