首页> 外文期刊>Issues in science and technology librarianship : STS electronic communications >Investigating Science Researchers' Presence on Academic Profile Websites: A Case Study of a Canadian Research University
【24h】

Investigating Science Researchers' Presence on Academic Profile Websites: A Case Study of a Canadian Research University

机译:调查科学研究人员在学术档案网站上的存在:一个加拿大研究大学的案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Researchers are increasingly using academic profile websites to organize and showcase their research outputs. Using the faculty at the science departments of the University of Saskatchewan, Canada as the study object, this research explores how science researchers used four academic profile websites: ResearchGate, Google Scholar Citations, Academia.edu, and ORCID. It was found that 78% of the researchers had established at least one academic profile, with ResearchGate being the most popular platform, Google Scholar Citations the second, followed at some distance by ORCID and Academia.edu. A high percentage of ORCID users did not list any of their publications, meaning their presence on ORCID was merely symbolic. We also found that the social interaction functions provided by ResearchGate were not well adopted. Findings from this study call for the improvement of the workflow of adding publications to ORCID profile.
机译:研究人员越来越多地使用学术档案网站来组织和展示他们的研究产出。在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省大学的科学部门作为研究对象,探讨了科学研究人员如何使用四个学术档案网站:研究,谷歌学者,学术界,Academia.edu和Orcid。有人发现,78%的研究人员已经建立了至少一个学术概况,研究是最受欢迎的平台,谷歌学者引文第二,随后orcid和Academia.edu的一定距离。高百分比的orcid用户没有列出任何出版物,这意味着他们在orcid上的存在只是象征性。我们还发现,研究所提供的社会互动职能并未充分采用。从本研究中调查呼吁改善向Orcid配置文件添加出版物的工作流程。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号