...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Nanomedicine >Quality Assessment and Comparison of Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Separated by Three Commercial Kits for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
【24h】

Quality Assessment and Comparison of Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Separated by Three Commercial Kits for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

机译:三种商用试剂盒中前列腺癌诊断中三种商用试剂盒分离的血浆衍生细胞内囊泡的质量评估及比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction:Current standard biomarkers in clinic are not specific enough for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nano-scale vesicles released by most mammalian cells. EVs are promising biomarker source for PCa liquid biopsy due to its minimal invasive approach, rich information and improved accuracy compared to the clinical standard prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, current EV separation methods cannot separate pure EVs and the quality characteristics from these methods remain largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the quality characteristics of human plasma-derived EVs by comparing three clinical suitable separation kits.Methods:We combined EV separation by commercial kits with magnetic beads capture and flow cytometry analysis, and compared three kits including ExoQuick Ultra based on precipitation and qEV35 and qEV70 based on size exclusion chromatography (SEC).Results:Our results indicated that two SEC kits provided higher EV purity and lower protein contamination compared to ExoQuick Ultra precipitation and that qEV35 demonstrated a higher EV yield but lower EV purity compared to qEV70. Particle number correlated very well particularly with CD9/81/63 positive EVs?for all three kits, which confirms that particle number can be used as the estimate for EV amount. At last, we found that several EV metrics including total EVs and PSA-specific EVs could not differentiate PCa patients from health controls.Conclusion:We provided a systematic workflow for the comparison of three separation kits as well as a general analysis process in clinical laboratories for EV-based cancer diagnosis. Better EV-associated cancer biomarkers need to be explored in the future study with a larger cohort.? 2020 Pang et al.
机译:简介:临床中的当前标准生物标志物对前列腺癌(PCA)诊断不足以足够。细胞外囊泡(EVS)是大多数哺乳动物细胞释放的纳米垢囊泡。由于其最小的侵入性方法,与临床标准前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)相比,EVS是对PCA液体活组织检查的有前途的生物标志物来源。然而,当前的EV分离方法不能将纯粹的EVS分离,并且这些方法的质量特征在很大程度上是未知的。在这项研究中,通过比较三种临床合适的分离套件来评估人血浆衍生EV的质量特征。方法:我们通过磁珠捕获和流式细胞术分析将EV分离组合,并比较了三个套件,包括exoquick超超降水和QEV35和QEV70基于尺寸排除色谱(SEC)。结果:我们的结果表明,与Exoquick超沉淀相比,两秒的套件提供了更高的EV纯度和低蛋白质污染,并且QEV35表现出更高的EV产量,但与QEV70。粒子数与CD9 / 81/63阳性EV相关,这是所有三个套件,这证实粒子数可以用作EV量的估计。最后,我们发现包括总EVS和PSA特异性EVS的几个EV指标无法区分PCA患者免受健康控制患者。结论:我们提供了一个系统的工作流程,用于比较三种分离套件以及临床实验室中的一般分析过程对于eV基癌症诊断。在未来的研究中需要探索更好的EV相关癌症生物标志物。 2020 Pang等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号