首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Radiation Oncology >Patterns of Dose Escalation Among Patients With Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Definitive Radiation Therapy: 2006-2016
【24h】

Patterns of Dose Escalation Among Patients With Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Definitive Radiation Therapy: 2006-2016

机译:食管癌患者接受明确放射治疗的剂量升级模式:2006-2016

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeAlthough single-institution series suggest potential benefit to dose escalation in definitive radiation therapy for esophageal cancer, randomized trials including intergroup-0123 and the recently presented A Randomized Trial of Dose Escalation in definitive Chemoradiotherapy for patients with Oesophageal cancer (ARTDECO) trial showed no improvement in outcomes with higher radiation therapy dose. As such, there may be significant variation in radiation dose for definitive treatment of esophageal cancer.Methods and MaterialsThe National Cancer Database was used to identify patients who received a diagnosis of nonmetastatic T2+ esophageal cancer between 2006 and 2016 who did not receive definitive surgery and were treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy doses between 41.4 and 74 Gy. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of receipt of >50.4 Gy, including year of diagnosis (2006-2013 vs 2014-2016) ? histology (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] vs adenocarcinoma) and year of diagnosis (2006-2013 vs 2014-2016) ? disease site (cervical esophagus vs noncervical esophagus) interaction terms, to assess whether the effect of diagnosis year on dose varied by histology and disease site, respectively.ResultsAmong 14,517 patients, the most common dose was 50.4 Gy, used for 6955 (47.9%) patients. Dose escalation above 50.4 Gy was observed in 4440 (30.6%) patients and declined by year, from 42.2% in 2006 to 23.5% in 2016. Patients with SCC versus adenocarcinoma had higher odds of dose escalation (39.3% vs 23.8%; AOR 1.46;P< .001), as did those with cervical esophageal primaries versus other primary sites (54.9% vs 27.4%; AOR 2.51;P< .001). The effect of later diagnosis year was greater for adenocarcinoma than for SCC (pint = 0.001, AOR 0.54,P< .001 vs AOR 0.71,P< .001) and significant for noncervical esophagus but not cervical esophagus (pint <0.001, AOR 0.56,P< .001 vs AOR 0.95,P= .616).ConclusionsDose escalation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer declined over time, particularly for adenocarcinoma histology and noncervical primary site. Given the recent results of ARTDECO, our findings can serve as a benchmark from which to measure future shifts in practice patterns.
机译:Purposeallooutouring Series促进了对食管癌的最终放射治疗剂量升级的潜在益处,随机试验包括杂交-0123,最近介绍了用于食管癌(Artdeco)试验的明确化学疗法中的剂量升级的随机试验表明没有改善在较高放射治疗剂量的结果中。因此,对于食管癌的最终治疗可能存在显着的辐射剂量。方法和物质的国家癌症数据库用于鉴定2006年至2016年期间未接受明确手术的诊断的患者。用化疗和放射治疗剂量在41.4和74 GY之间进行处理。多变量逻辑回归收到的调整后的赔率比(AOR)> 50.4 GY,包括诊断年份(2006-2013 VS 2014-2016)?组织学(鳞状细胞癌[SCC] VS腺癌)和诊断年份(2006-2013 VS 2014-2016)?疾病部位(宫颈食管vs非诊所食道)相互作用术语,评估诊断年份对剂量的诊断年份是否因组织学和疾病遗址而变化。患者,最常见的剂量为50.4 Gy,用于6955(47.9%)耐心。在4440名(30.6%)患者中观察到50.4Gy以上的剂量升级,并在2006年的42.2%下降至2016年的42.2%至23.5%.SCC与腺癌的患者具有较高的剂量升级的几率(39.3%Vs 23.8%; AOR 1.46 ; p <.001),那些宫颈食管初级与其他主要部位(54.9%vs 27.4%; aor 2.51; p <.001)。腺癌诊断年龄较大的效果比SCC(品脱= 0.001,AOR 0.54,P <.001,P <.001,P <.001,P <.001,P <.001),并且对于非诊所的食管而言,但不是宫颈食道(品脱<0.001,AOR 0.56 ,P <.001 VS AOR 0.95,P = .616)。结论在最新的化学机制中的升级,用于食管癌的食管癌随着时间的推移,特别是对于腺癌组织学和非诊所的主要部位。鉴于最近的Artdeco结果,我们的研究结果可以作为衡量实践模式的未来班次的基准。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号