...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >Effect of stent combined with drugs therapy on cognitive function in patients with symptomatic severe vertebrobasilar artery stenosis and cognitive dysfunction
【24h】

Effect of stent combined with drugs therapy on cognitive function in patients with symptomatic severe vertebrobasilar artery stenosis and cognitive dysfunction

机译:支架结合药物治疗对症状严重椎弓鼠动脉狭窄患者认知功能的影响及认知功能障碍

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Objective To compare the effects of stent combined with drug therapy and aggressive artery stenosis and cognitive dysfunction. Methods A total of 53 patients from October 2016 to March 2019 with symptomatic severe intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis and cognitive dysfunction were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups [stent combined with drugs group ( n = 31) and aggressive drugs alone group ( n = 22)] based on patients' informed consent. Perioperative status of stent combined with drugs group and incidence of adverse events in both groups were analyzed. Montreal Congnitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were compared in hospitalization period, 1 month and 6 months at follow?up in order to evaluate the improvement of cognition. Then subgroup analysis of different collateral circulation status before stent combined with drugs group was conducted. Results There were 2 cases of perioperative complication in stent combined with drugs group, and there was no statistical difference in cumulative incidence of adverse events and ischemic stroke between 2 groups. According to the comparion that MoCA scores in hospitalization, 1 month and 6 months at follow ? up in two different therapy groups, the score of delayed recall had statistical significance (P = 0.005), which indicted stent group had advantages in delayed recall over drugs group. The scores of total MoCA ( P = 0.000), line connection test ( P = 0.028), drawing clock ( P = 0.006), attention ( P = 0.001) and delayed recall ( P = 0.000) had statistical significance in different follow ? up time points and were significantly improved in stent group. In stent group, the scores of total MoCA ( P = 0.000, 0.000, 0.009) and attention ( P = 0.000, 0.000, 0.030) improved in succession in the time of before treatment, 1 month and 6 months at follow?up. However, the scores ofline connection test ( P = 0.001, 0.000), drawing clock ( P = 0.006, 0.000), and delayed recall ( P = 0.000, 0.000) improved mainly within first month at discharge. As to the scores of MoCA in different preoperative collateral circulation status groups, sentence repetition only had statistical significance ( P = 0.021). The scores of total MoC ( P = 0.000), line connection test ( P = 0.000), drawing clock ( P = 0.002), attention ( P = 0.000) and delayed recall ( P = 0.000) had statistical significance in different follow?up timepoints. In further comparion of changes of MoCA scores at different time points in 2 preoperative collateral circulation status groups, scores of total MoCA ( P = 0.006, 0.006) and attention ( P = 0.005, 0.002) were higher at follow?up of 6 month than these in hospitalization and 1 month follow?up in good collateral group, which suggested the scores above improved mainly between 1 month and 6 month at discharge. The score of delayed recall at discharge after 6 month was higher than it in hospitalization. The scores of total MoCA ( P = 0.000, 0.000), line connection test ( P = 0.003, 0.001), drawing clock ( P = 0.004, 0.001), attention ( P = 0.000, 0.000) and delayed recall ( P = 0.000, 0.000) were higher at follow?up of 1 month and 6 month than these in hospitalization in poor collateral group, which suggested the scores above improved mainly within first month at discharge. Conclusions As to the patients with symptomatic severe vertebrobasilar artery stenosis and cognitive dysfunction, the improvement in multiple cognitive domains of stent combined with drugs therapy and the advantage over aggressive drugs alone group were observed. Meanwhile, the time of cognitive benefit was earlier in poor preoperative collateral circulation status groups than in good collateral group.
机译:摘要目的比较支架结合药物治疗和侵袭动脉狭窄和认知功能障碍的影响。方法共有53名患者2016年10月至2019年3月患有症状严重的颅内椎动脉狭窄和认知功能障碍。根据患者的知情同意,患者分为2组[支架与药物组(N = 31)和药物组(n = 31)和侵袭性药物合并]。分析了两组支架联合药支架的围手术期地位,两组不良事件发生率。蒙特利尔康润评估(MOCA)在住院期间比较,1个月和6个月,以便评估认知的改善。然后进行了在支架与药物组联合之前的不同抵押循环状态的亚组分析。结果支架结合药物组有2例围手术期并发症,两组不良事件累积发生率和缺血性卒中无统计学差异。根据莫卡分数在住院治疗,1个月和6个月以下的比较?在两种不同的治疗组中,延迟召回的得分具有统计学意义(P = 0.005),其中征准支架组在药物组延迟召回中具有优势。总MOCA的分数(P = 0.000),线路连接测试(P = 0.028),绘图时钟(P = 0.006),注意力(P = 0.001)和延迟召回(P = 0.000)在不同之后有统计学意义?支架群体显着改善了时间点。在支架组中,总MOCA的分数(P = 0.000,0.009)和注意力(P = 0.000,0.000,0.030,0.030)在治疗前的时间内提高,遵循1个月和6个月。然而,线路连接测试的分数(P = 0.001,0.000),绘图时钟(P = 0.006,0.000),延迟召回(P = 0.000,0.000)主要在放电的第一个月内改善。至于不同术前侧支循环状态群中的MOCA的分数,句子重复仅具有统计学意义(P = 0.021)。总MOC的分数(P = 0.000),线路连接测试(P = 0.000),绘图时钟(P = 0.002),注意力(P = 0.000)和延迟召回(P = 0.000)在不同的跟随时具有统计学意义时间点。进一步与MOCA分数的变化在2个术前侧循环状态组中的不同时间点的变化,总MOCA的分数(p = 0.006,006)和注意力(p = 0.005,0.002)较高,在6个月的6个月内较高这些在住院期间和1个月在良好的抵押品小组中遵循?提出了以上评分的评分主要在1个月和6个月的出院之间。在6个月后放电延迟召回的分数高于住院中的放电。总MOCA的分数(P = 0.000,0.000),线路连接测试(P = 0.003,000),绘图时钟(P = 0.004,0.001),注意(P = 0.000,0.000)和延迟召回(P = 0.000, 0.000)在较低的抵押品组中遵循1个月和6个月的追随者较高,这提出了上述分数主要在排放时的第一个月内得到改善。结论对症状严重椎弓鼠动脉狭窄和认知功能障碍的患者,观察到与药物治疗相结合的多重认知结构域的改善及单独对侵袭性药物的优势。与此同时,认知益处的时间早期缺乏良好的副循环状态群体,而不是良好的抵押品组。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号