...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences Discussions >Isoprene emission potentials from European oak forests derived from canopy flux measurements: an assessment of uncertainties and inter-algorithm variability
【24h】

Isoprene emission potentials from European oak forests derived from canopy flux measurements: an assessment of uncertainties and inter-algorithm variability

机译:来自欧洲橡木森林的异戊二烯排放潜力来自冠层助焊剂测量:对不确定性和算法间变异性的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Biogenic emission algorithms predict that oak forests account for ~?70?% of the total European isoprene budget. Yet the isoprene emission potentials (IEPs) that underpin these model estimates are calculated from a very limited number of leaf-level observations and hence are highly uncertain. Increasingly, micrometeorological techniques such as eddy covariance are used to measure whole-canopy fluxes directly, from which isoprene emission potentials can be calculated. Here, we review five observational datasets of isoprene fluxes from a range of oak forests in the UK, Italy and France. We outline procedures to correct the measured net fluxes for losses from deposition and chemical flux divergence, which were found to be on the order of 5–8 and 4–5?%, respectively. The corrected observational data were used to derive isoprene emission potentials at each site in a two-step process. Firstly, six commonly used emission algorithms were inverted to back out time series of isoprene emission potential, and then an average isoprene emission potential was calculated for each site with an associated uncertainty. We used these data to assess how the derived emission potentials change depending upon the specific emission algorithm used and, importantly, on the particular approach adopted to derive an average site-specific emission potential. Our results show that isoprene emission potentials can vary by up to a factor of 4 depending on the specific algorithm used and whether or not it is used in a big-leaf or canopy environment (CE) model format. When using the same algorithm, the calculated average isoprene emission potential was found to vary by as much as 34?% depending on how the average was derived. Using a consistent approach with version?2.1 of the Model for Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN), we derive new ecosystem-scale isoprene emission potentials for the five measurement sites: Alice Holt, UK (10?500?±?2500?μg?m?2?h?1); Bosco Fontana, Italy (1610?±?420?μg?m?2?h?1); Castelporziano, Italy (121?±?15?μg?m?2?h?1); Ispra, Italy (7590?±?1070?μg?m?2?h?1); and the Observatoire de Haute Provence, France (7990?±?1010?μg?m?2?h?1). Ecosystem-scale isoprene emission potentials were then extrapolated to the leaf-level and compared to previous leaf-level measurements for Quercus robur and Quercus pubescens, two species thought to account for 50?% of the total European isoprene budget. The literature values agreed closely with emission potentials calculated using the G93 algorithm, which were 85?±?75 and 78?±?25?μg?g?1?h?1 for Q. robur and Q. pubescens, respectively. By contrast, emission potentials calculated using the G06 algorithm, the same algorithm used in a previous study to derive the European budget, were significantly lower, which we attribute to the influence of past light and temperature conditions. Adopting these new G06 specific emission potentials for Q. robur (55?±?24?μg?g?1?h?1) and Q. pubescens (47?±?16?μg?g?1?h?1) reduced the projected European budget by ~?17?%. Our findings demonstrate that calculated isoprene emission potentials vary considerably depending upon the specific approach used in their calculation. Therefore, it is our recommendation that the community now adopt a standardised approach to the way in which micrometeorological flux measurements are corrected and used to derive isoprene, and other biogenic volatile organic compounds, emission potentials.
机译:生物发射算法预测橡木森林占欧洲总异脂预算的70倍。然而,基于这些模型估计的异戊二烯发射电位(IEP)由非常有限数量的叶级观察计算,因此高度不确定。越来越多地,使用诸如Eddy协方差的微型气象技术直接测量整个冠层通量,从中可以计算异戊二烯发射电位。在这里,我们回顾了来自英国,意大利和法国的一系列橡树林的异戊二烯通量的五个观察分产。我们概述了从沉积和化学通量分歧的损失损失测量的净助量的程序,这些循环分别为5-8和4-5倍的损失。校正的观察数据用于在两​​步过程中从每个部位衍生异戊二烯排放电位。首先,将六种常用的发射算法反转以退出时间序列的异戊二烯发射电位,然后针对每个位点计算平均异戊二烯排放电位,具有相关的不确定性。我们利用这些数据来评估衍生发射电位如何根据所用的特定排放算法改变,重要的是,关于所采用的特定方法来得出平均特定的发射潜力。我们的结果表明,异戊二烯发射电位取决于所使用的特定算法以及它是否用于大叶或冠层环境(CE)模型格式。当使用相同的算法时,发现计算的平均异戊二烯排放电位取决于平均值的平均值如何变化。使用符合版本的方法?2.1的气体和气溶胶型号的模型(梅根),我们推出了五个测量地点的新的生态系统级异戊二烯排放潜力:爱丽丝Holt,英国(10?500?±2500 ?μg?m?2?h?1);博斯科福纳纳,意大利(1610?±420?μg?m?2?H?1); Castelporziano,意大利(121?±15?μg?m?2?H?1); ISPRA,意大利(7590?±1070?μg?m?2?H?1);和法国的Joveratoatoire de Haute Provence(7990?±1010?μg?m?2?H?1)。然后将生态系统级异戊二烯排放电位推断为叶子水平,与前一叶级疣和栎普氏胶囊的叶子级测量相比,两种物种认为占欧洲总异脂预算的50?%。与使用G93算法计算的发射电位相同的文献值,该算法为85?±75和78?±25Ω·μg?1?H?1分别为Q. Robur和Q.Pubescens。相比之下,使用G06算法计算的发射电位,与前一项研究中使用的相同算法导出欧洲预算的算法显着降低,我们归因于过去光和温度条件的影响。采用这些新的G06特定发射电位为Q. Robur(55?±24?μg≤1≤h≤1)和Q. pubescens(47?±16?μg?g?1?h?1)减少预计欧洲预算〜?17?%。我们的研究结果表明,计算的异戊二烯发射电位取决于其计算中使用的具体方法。因此,我们的建议是,社区现在采用标准化方法来校正微调助势测量并用于衍生异戊二烯,以及其他生物挥发性有机化合物,发射电位。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号