...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Stretching and relaxing the plantar fascia may change plantar fascia thickness but not pressure pain thresholds: a cross-sectional study of patients with plantar fasciopathy
【24h】

Stretching and relaxing the plantar fascia may change plantar fascia thickness but not pressure pain thresholds: a cross-sectional study of patients with plantar fasciopathy

机译:伸展和放松的跖筋可能会改变跖筋厚度,但不会迫使疼痛疼痛阈值:对Purtorar筋膜病患者的横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite the established relevance of ultrasonography and assessment of pressure pain thresholds in patients with plantar fasciopathy, patient and probe positioning has been mostly ignored and are not necessarily reported in research. The primary aim of this study was to compare plantar fascia thickness in stretched and relaxed positions in patients with plantar fasciopathy. The secondary aim was to compare plantar heel pressure pain thresholds in these positions. In this cross-sectional study, we measured the plantar fascia thickness with ultrasonography, and localised pressure pain thresholds using pressure algometry of 20 patients with plantar fasciopathy. These were assessed bilaterally, with the plantar fascia in both a stretched and relaxed position. In the stretched position, toes were maximally dorsiflexed, while in the relaxed position participants’ feet were hanging freely over the end of the table. The plantar fascia of the most symptomatic foot was significantly thicker when stretched compared with the relaxed position (sagittal: mean difference 0.2?mm, 95%CI: 0.1–0.4, P?=?0.013; frontal: mean difference???0.27, 95%CI: ??0.49 to ??0.06, P?=?0.014). The plantar fascia was significantly thinner in the frontal plane compared with the sagittal plane in both positions (stretched: mean difference???0.2?mm, 95%CI: ??0.42 to ??0.03, P?=?0.025; relaxed: mean difference???0.3?mm, 95%CI:-0.49 to ??0.08, P?=?0.008). There was no difference between pressure pain thresholds in stretched or relaxed positions in either foot (P??0.4). The plantar fascia was significantly thicker in a stretched compared with a relaxed position and in the sagittal compared with the frontal plane, but differences were smaller than the standard deviation. Pressure pain thresholds were not different between the positions. These results highlight the importance of how ultrasonography is performed and reported in research to allow for replication. The study was pre-registered September 25th, 2017 on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03291665 ).
机译:尽管采用超声检查和对跖伞患者的患者的压力疼痛阈值的既定相关性,但患者和探针定位大多忽略了,并不一定在研究中报告。本研究的主要目的是将Purtorar筋膜厚度与Purtorar诱惑患者的拉伸和轻松的位置进行比较。二次目的是将Plantar脚跟压力疼痛阈值与这些位置进行比较。在这种横截面研究中,我们用超声检查测量了跖筋厚度,并使用20例PuralarAcopathy的患者的压力抗血管术来测量局部压力疼痛阈值。这些被双侧评估,跖骨筋膜在拉伸和放松的位置。在拉伸位置,脚趾最大地背屈,而在放松的位置参与者中,参与者的脚在桌子的末端自由悬挂。与松弛位置相比拉伸时,最具症状脚的跖筋显着较大(矢状物:平均差0.2Ω·mm,95%Ci:0.1-0.4,p?= 0.013;正面:平均差异??? 0.27, 95%CI:?? 0.49至?? 0.06,p?= 0.014)。与两个位置的矢状平面相比,跖骨在正面平面上显着更薄(拉伸:平均差异为0.2Ωmm,95%Ci:0.42至约0.03,p?= 0.025;放松:平均差异??? 0.3?mm,95%CI:-0.49至约0.08,p?= 0.008)。在任何脚(P?> 0.4)之间拉伸或松弛位置的压力疼痛阈值之间没有差异。与前平面相比,跖筋与放松的位置和矢状相比显着较厚,但差异小于标准偏差。在位置之间的压力疼痛阈值并不不同。这些结果突出了如何在研究中进行超声检查的重要性,以便复制。该研究在2017年9月25日之前预先注册到Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT03291665)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号