首页> 外文期刊>BMC Surgery >Self-expandable metallic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for acute malignant right-sided colorectal obstruction
【24h】

Self-expandable metallic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for acute malignant right-sided colorectal obstruction

机译:自膨胀金属支架作为一种桥梁选修手术与急性恶性右侧结直肠梗阻的急诊手术

获取原文
       

摘要

The use of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery has increased for patients with obstructing colorectal cancer. However, relatively few reports have compared SEMS as a bridge to elective surgery for acute malignant obstruction of the right-sided colon (MORC) vs. emergency surgery (ES). This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of elective surgery after SEMS placement vs. ES for patients (including stage IV cases) with acute MORC. Patients with acute MORC who underwent radical resection for a primary tumour from July 2008 to November 2016 at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were retrospectively enrolled. Postoperative short-term outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the SEMS and ES groups. In total, 107 patients with acute MORC (35 in the SEMS group and 72 in the ES group) were included for analysis. The Intensive Care Unit admission rate was lower (11.4% vs. 34.7%, P?=?0.011), the incidence of complications was reduced (11.4% vs. 29.2%, P?=?0.042), and the postoperative length of hospitalisation was significantly shorter (8.23?±?6.50 vs. 11.18?±?6.71?days, P?=?0.033) for the SEMS group. Survival curves showed no significant difference in PFS (P?=?0.506) or OS (P?=?0.989) between groups. Also, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS rates between patients with stage II and III colon cancer. After colectomy for synchronous liver metastases among stage IV patients, the hepatectomy rates for the SEMS and ES groups were 85.7% and 14.3%, respectively (P?=?0.029). The hazard ratio for colectomy alone vs. combined resection was 3.258 (95% CI 0.858–12.370; P?=?0.041). Stent placement offers significant advantages in terms of short-term outcomes and comparable prognoses for acute MORC patients. For synchronous liver metastases, SEMS placement better prepares the patient for resection of the primary tumour and liver metastasis, which contribute to improved survival.
机译:对于患有结肠直肠癌的患者,使用自膨胀金属支架(SEM)作为手术的桥梁已经增加。然而,相对较少的报告已经将SEM与SEM与右侧冒号(MORC)的急性恶性障碍进行选修手术的桥梁与急诊手术进行比较。本研究旨在评估SEMS置入患者(包括阶段IV病例)后选择性手术对急性疗程的益处。急性Morc患者从2008年7月到2016年11月在复旦大学中山医院接受了急性肿瘤的急性沼肠,重新开始注册。在SEM和ES组之间比较了术后短期结果,无进展的存活率(PFS)和总存活(OS)。共有107例急性莫尔康(SEMS组35患者,ES组中的72例)进行分析。重症监护单位入院率较低(11.4%对34.7%,P?= 0.011),减少了并发症的发生率(11.4%对29.2%,p?= 0.042),以及术后住院时间对于SEM组,显着缩短(8.23?±6.50〜11.5.5.5,p?= 0.033)。存活曲线在组之间存在没有显着差异(p?= 0.506)或OS(p?= 0.989)。此外,阶段II和III结肠癌患者之间的PFS和OS率没有显着差异。在IV阶段患者中同步肝转移结肠切除术后,SEMS和ES组的肝切除率分别为85.7%和14.3%(P?= 0.029)。单独同源聚合物与组合切除术的危害比为3.258(95%CI 0.858-12.370; p?= 0.041)。在短期成果和急性Morc患者的可比预期方面,支架放置具有显着的优势。对于同步肝转移,SEMS放置更好地为患者切除了原发性肿瘤和肝转移,这有助于提高存活。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号