首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Influence of motivation and a new digitized training program on undergraduate dental students during preclinical scaling training
【24h】

Influence of motivation and a new digitized training program on undergraduate dental students during preclinical scaling training

机译:临床前缩放培训本科牙科学生对本科牙科学生的影响和新数字化培训计划的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The current study evaluated whether a new digitized scaling training program (DTP: n?=?30; supervisor-student-ratio 1:10) improves the performance of undergraduate dental student during a preclinical course in regard to two different instruments [sonic scalers (AIR) and Gracey curettes (GRA)] compared to a conventional training program (CTP: n?=?19; supervisor-student-ratio 1:4). All the participants received a two-hour lecture on both instruments, followed by a 12-week period with a weekly training program lasting 45?min (10 sessions); one group was supported by DTP. At the end of the training phase, all the participants performed the subgingival scaling of six equivalent test teeth using GRA and AIR. Treatment time, proportion of removed simulated biofilm (relative cleaning efficacy, RCE-b) and hard deposits (RCE-d) were recorded. By using a pseudonymized questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale, self-assessment of scaling effort, handling, root surface roughness/destruction and effectiveness were evaluated. In addition, personal data such as age, gender, handedness, regularity of playing computer games/consoles and previous dental/technical or medical education were elevated and correlated with cleaning efficacy. The DTP participants showed higher effectiveness in RCE-b compared to those who used the CTP with GRA (71.54% vs. 67.23%, p?=?0.004) and AIR (71.75% vs. 62.63%, p?≤?0.001), and the DTP students were faster with both instruments (p?≤?0.001). For RCE-d, there was no significant difference between the DTP and CTP groups (GRA p?=?0.471; AIR p?=?0.158), whereas DTP showed better RCE-d results with GRA versus AIR (84.68% vs. 77.85%, p??0.001). According to the questionnaire, no significant differences were detected between the training groups in terms of self-assessment, handling, treatment time, root surface roughness/destruction or effectiveness of the instruments. The CTP group favored AIR compared to GRA regarding the fatigue effect. The CTP and playing computer games/consoles regularly was correlated with lower RCE-b, whereas previous education in medicine/dentistry was correlated with higher RCE-b values. Within the limitations of the study, the DTP with a reduced supervision effort compared to the CTP resulted in higher effectiveness and lower instrumentation time for removing simulated biofilms.
机译:目前的研究评估了新的数字化培训计划(DTP:n吗?=?30;主管 - 学生 - 比率1:10)提高了本科生学生在两种不同乐器的临床前课程中的表现[声音校长(与传统培训计划相比,空气)和优雅的刮刀(GRA)](CTP:N?= 19;主管 - 学生比率1:4)。所有参与者在这两个仪器上都有两小时的讲座,其次是12周的时间,每周训练计划持续45?分钟(10次会议); DTP支持一组。在训练阶段结束时,所有参与者使用GRA和空气进行六等效测试牙齿的龈下缩放。记录治疗时间,记录去除模拟的生物膜(相对清洁功效,RCE-B)和硬沉积物(RCE-D)的比例。通过使用具有5分李克特量表的假义问卷,评估了缩放工作的自我评估,处理,根表粗糙度/破坏和有效性。此外,诸如年龄,性别,手腕,播放计算机游戏/游戏机的规律性以及先前牙科/技术或医学教育的个人数据升高并与清洁效能相关。与使用CTP的那些使用用GRA(71.54%与67.23%,P?= 0.004)和空气(71.75%vs.62.63%,p?≤≤00.0.001),DTP参与者在RCE-B中表现出更高的效果。仪器(P?≤≤0.001),DTP学生更快。对于RCE-D,DTP和CTP组之间没有显着差异(GRA P?= 0.471; AIR P?= 0.158),而DTP显示出GRA与空气的更好的RCE-D结果(84.68%VS. 77.85 %,p?<0.001)。根据调查问卷,在自我评估,处理,治疗时间,根表面粗糙度/破坏或仪器的效果方面没有检测到培训群之间的显着差异。与GRA相比,CTP组有助于疲劳效果。 CTP和播放计算机游戏/经常与较低的RCE-B相关联,而先前的医学/牙科教育与较高的RCE-B值相关。在研究的局限内,与CTP相比,DTP具有减少的监督努力导致效率更高,仪器仪器较低,用于去除模拟生物膜。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号