首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests
【24h】

Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests

机译:核酸扩增试验的2019年新型冠状病毒检测的不同样品的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

An ongoing outbreak of severe respiratory pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus has recently emerged in China. Here we report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics of 19 suspect cases. We compared the positive ratio of 2019-nCoV nucleic acid amplification test results from different samples including oropharyngeal swab, blood, urine and stool with 3 different fluorescent RT-PCR kits. Nine out of the 19 patients had 2019-nCoV infection detected using oropharyngeal swab samples, and the virus nucleic acid was also detected in eight of these nine patients using stool samples. None of positive results was identified in the blood and urine samples. These three different kits got the same result for each sample and the positive ratio of nucleic acid detection for 2019-nCoV was only 47.4% in the suspect patients. Therefore, it is possible that infected patients have been missed by using nucleic acid detection only. It might be better to make a diagnosis combining the computed tomography scans and nucleic acid detection.
机译:最近在中国出现了与2019年新型冠状病毒有关的严重呼吸道肺炎的持续爆发。在这里,我们报告了19名可疑病例的流行病学,临床,实验室和放射性特征。我们将2019-NCOV核酸扩增试验结果与不同样品的阳性比进行了比较,包括口咽拭子,血液,尿液和粪便的3种不同的荧光RT-PCR试剂盒。在19名患者中有九种患者使用口咽拭子样品检测到2019-NCOV感染,并且在这九个患者中也检测到病毒核酸在这九个患者中有八个使用粪便样品。血液和尿液样品中没有鉴定阳性结果。这三种不同的试剂盒得到了同样的结果,每个样品都有相同的结果,核酸检测的核酸检测的阳性比在怀疑患者中仅为47.4%。因此,通过使用核酸检测,可能错过了感染的患者。结合计算的断层扫描和核酸检测可能更好地进行诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号