首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Action 3:30R: process evaluation of a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8 to 10?year olds
【24h】

Action 3:30R: process evaluation of a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8 to 10?year olds

机译:行动3:30R:群集的过程评估随机性可行性研究修订的教学助理 - LED课外物理活动干预8至10?岁月

获取原文
           

摘要

Numerous interventions to increase children's physical activity levels are published, yet, few studies report indicators of external validity. Process evaluations are critical for assessing intervention implementation, sustainability and effectiveness. A mixed-methods process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework, was conducted to evaluate the internal and external validity of Action 3:30R, a revised teaching assistant-led after-school intervention which aimed to increase physical activity in children aged 8-10?years and was underpinned by Self-determination Theory (SDT). Data were collected and reported in line with the five components of RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance). Quantitative measures included logbooks, registers and self-reported teaching-efficacy, autonomy support, child enjoyment and perceived exertion questionnaires. Questionnaire data were collected at three points throughout the 15-week intervention. Observations by trained researchers were also conducted to assess fidelity to the intervention manual and its underpinning theory. Post-intervention focus groups with pupils and interviews with teaching assistants (TAs), school staff and external stakeholders explored the implementation and potential sustainability of Action 3:30R from stakeholders' perspectives. Action 3:30R appealed to a broad range of pupils, including girls and less-active pupils. The Action 3:30R TA training was implemented as intended and was perceived as valuable professional development. Releasing staff for training was a barrier in two of the six intervention schools, which were unable to deliver the intervention as a result. Pupils enjoyed the intervention, and the Action 3:30R core principles underpinned by SDT were implemented with high fidelity, as was the intervention itself. Scheduling conflicts with other clubs and lack of parental support were perceived as the main barriers to recruitment and attendance. Lack of space and season were cited as the main barriers affecting the quality of delivery. The study shows evidence of maintenance, as one intervention school decided to continue Action 3:30R beyond the study. Funding and continued TA training were suggested as factors which may affect the maintenance of Action 3:30R. Action 3:30R is an enjoyable, autonomy-supportive after-school programme, which engages a range of pupils and offers TAs valuable training. RE-AIM provided helpful structure and is recommended for intervention evaluations. ISRCTN34001941 . Prospectively registered 01/12/2016.
机译:若干干预措施,尚未研究外部有效性的报告指标。过程评估对于评估干预实施,可持续性和有效性至关重要。使用重新瞄准框架进行混合方法的过程评估,以评估行动的内部和外部有效性3:30R,修订的教学助理主导的课后干预,旨在提高8岁的儿童体育活动10?多年来被自决理论(SDT)受到了基础。收集数据并符合重新瞄准的五个组成部分(达到,​​有效,采用,实施和维护)。定量措施包括日志,登记,自我报告的教学效率,自主支持,儿童享受和感知的劳动问卷。在整个15周干预的三个点收集问卷数据。还进行了受过培训的研究人员的观察,以评估忠诚于干预手册及其支撑理论。干预后焦点小组与教学助理(TAS),学校工作人员和外部利益攸关方的采访探讨了行动3:30的实施和潜在的可持续性。行动3:30载有广泛的学生,包括女孩和活跃的学生。行动3:30R TA培训按预期实施,并被视为有价值的专业发展。释放培训员工是六所干预学校中的两所障碍,这是由于结果无法提供干预。学生享受干预,行动3:30R由SDT支付的30R核心原则以高保真程度实施,介入本身就是如此。安排与其他俱乐部的冲突以及缺乏父母支持被认为是招聘和出席的主要障碍。缺乏空间和季节被引用为影响交付质量的主要障碍。这项研究显示了维护的证据,因为一个干预学校决定继续行动3:30 r超出研究。建议资金和持续的TA培训作为可能影响行动维持3:30R的因素。行动3:30R是一种愉快,自主支持的课后课程,涉及一系列学生并提供TAS宝贵的培训。重新瞄准提供了有用的结构,并建议进行干预评估。 ISRCTN34001941。潜在注册01/12/2016。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号