...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Smoking cessation care can translate to lower hazard of death in the short-run in cancer patients - a retrospective cohort study to demonstrate the value of smoking cessation services within the treatment phase of cancer
【24h】

Smoking cessation care can translate to lower hazard of death in the short-run in cancer patients - a retrospective cohort study to demonstrate the value of smoking cessation services within the treatment phase of cancer

机译:戒烟护理可以转化为癌症患者短期内的死亡危害 - 一个回顾性队列研究,以证明癌症治疗阶段吸烟服务的价值

获取原文
           

摘要

Smoking cessation is a key step towards improving cancer care and outcomes. However, smoking cessation interventions are underprovided in oncology settings. Within Jordan's only comprehensive oncology center, we sought to evaluate receipt of care at a smoking cessation clinic and the effect of assisted abstinence through the smoking cessation clinic on short-term (two-year) survival after a cancer diagnosis. We employed a retrospective cohort study design. Cancer registry and smoking cessation clinic data for adult Jordanian cancer patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2016, who also were cigarette smokers, and who received full treatment at King Hussein Cancer Center, were analyzed. Specifically, descriptive statistics of patients who visited the smoking cessation clinic were generated, and short-term (two-year) hazard of death of patients based on whether or not smoking cessation clinic-assisted abstinence occurred, were evaluated. There were 3403 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Approximately 21% of cancer patients were seen at the smoking cessation clinic, and significant demographic and clinical disparities in who was being seen [at the smoking cessation clinic] existed. In 2387 patients with available survival data, smokers who never went to the smoking cessation clinic (or were seen only once, or seen a year or more from diagnosis) had a hazard of death 2.8 times higher than smokers who had visited the smoking cessation clinic and who also confirmed they had not smoked on atleast two of their 3-, 6- or 12-month follow-up visits (95% confidence interval [CI]?=?1.7-4.6). Non-abstainers at the smoking cessation clinic exhibited a similar disadvantage (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.0). Although evidence-based smoking cessation interventions increase the likelihood of abstinence and can lower the short-term hazard of death during cancer treatment, there is a deprioritization of smoking cessation interventions during cancer care, as indicated by low proportions of patients seen at the smoking cessation clinic. Our findings emphasize the importance of promoting interventions to avail smoking cessation interventions in oncology settings within the cancer treatment phase.
机译:吸烟是改善癌症护理和结果的关键步骤。然而,吸烟停止干预措施在肿瘤学设置中劣质。在约旦的唯一全面的肿瘤学中心,我们试图在吸烟诊断中评估戒烟诊所的收到护理,并通过在癌症诊断后的短期(两年)存活中通过吸烟障碍辅助禁欲的效果。我们采用了回顾性的队列研究设计。分析了癌症注册管理机构和吸烟诊所的成人约旦癌症患者,诊断为2009年至2016年,他也是卷烟吸烟者,并在侯赛因癌症中心接受全面治疗。具体而言,基于是否发生吸烟诊所辅助禁止的患者患者进行吸烟诊所的患者的描述性统计,并进行短期(两年)死亡死亡障碍。有3403名患者达到了我们的纳入标准。在吸烟诊所看到大约21%的癌症患者,并且存在着显着的人口统计和临床差异[在吸烟诊所]存在。在2387名患者中,可用的存活数据,从未去过吸烟的吸烟者诊所(或者只有一次,或者从诊断中看到一年或更多)的危险会比访问吸烟诊所的吸烟者高2.8倍的危险谁也证实他们在他们的3-,6或12个月的后续访问中至少有两次(95%置信区间[CI]?=?1.7-4.6)。戒烟诊所的非禁止者展出了类似的劣势(HR 2.7,95%CI 1.4-5.0)。虽然基于证据的戒烟干预措施增加了禁欲的可能性,并且可以降低癌症治疗期间死亡的短期危害,但在癌症治疗期间吸烟干预的脱离病,如吸烟停止所示的低比例所示诊所。我们的调查结果强调了促进干预措施在癌症治疗阶段内吸收肿瘤学环境中吸烟干预的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号