首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine >Conservative versus operative management of postoperative lumbar discitis
【24h】

Conservative versus operative management of postoperative lumbar discitis

机译:保守与术后腰椎炎症的术语管理

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Treatment option of postoperative discitis (POD) is either conservative or operative, but till date, there are no established validated protocols of the treatment of postoperative lumbar discitis. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of conservative versus operative management of POD following single-level lumbar discectomy. Methods: We prospectively studied a total of 38 cases of POD. The patients were diagnosed clinically, radiologically, and by laboratory investigations and followed up with serial erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. Demographic data, clinical variables, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, and posttreatment complications were collected, and pre- and postoperative assessment was done using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Functional outcome of the study was measured by the modified criteria of Kirkaldy–Willis. Results: VAS score for pain was significantly decreased in both groups after treatment. However, posttreatment differences were not statistically significant. In posttreatment mean JOA score, differences were not statistically significant in both groups except the mean difference (?0.47) of restriction of daily activities, which was statistically significant (95% confidence interval: ?0.88–?0.07, P = 0.025, unpaired t -test). About 73.7% and 84.2% of the patients had a satisfactory functional outcome in conservative and operative management groups, respectively, at the end of 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: Operative management yielded better outcomes than traditional conservative treatment in terms of functional outcomes, length of hospital stays, and duration of antibiotic treatment as determined by both the pain and daily activity levels.
机译:背景:术后椎间盘突出(POD)的治疗方案是保守或手​​术,但迄今为止,没有建立术后腰椎炎治疗的验证方案。目的:本研究的目的是评估单级腰椎切除术后的保守与豆荚的疗法的结果。方法:我们展示了38例豆荚。患者在临床上,放射性地进行诊断,并通过实验室研究并随访,然后随访,随后进行连续红细胞沉降速率(ESR),C反应蛋白,X射线,计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像。收集了人口统计数据,临床变量,住院时间,抗生素治疗持续时间和后处理并发症,并使用视觉模拟规模(VAS)和日本矫形协会(JOA)得分进行预先和术后评估。该研究的功能结果是通过kirkaly-inlis的修改标准来衡量。结果:治疗后,两组疼痛的VAS分数显着降低。然而,后病理差异没有统计学意义。在后处理意味着Joa评分中,除了平均差异(?0.47)的日常活动的平均差异(?0.47),差异在统计学上有显着(95%置信区间:0.88-?0.07,P = 0.025,未配对T. -测试)。约73.7%和84.2%的患者分别在12个月的随访结束时分别在保守和手术管理团体中具有令人满意的功能结果。结论:在功能结果方面,手术管理比传统的保守治疗更好的结果,医院住院时间和抗生素治疗的持续时间,如疼痛和日常活性水平确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号