...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Medicine >The Efficacy of Rotary, Reciprocating, and Combined Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatment Techniques in Removing a Carrier-Based Root Canal Filling Material from Straight Root Canal Systems: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis
【24h】

The Efficacy of Rotary, Reciprocating, and Combined Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatment Techniques in Removing a Carrier-Based Root Canal Filling Material from Straight Root Canal Systems: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis

机译:旋转,往复运动和组合的非手术内渗透技术从直根管道系统中除去载体的根管填充材料的疗效:微计算断层扫描分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the efficacy of three non-surgical endodontic retreatment techniques in removing a carrier-based root canal filling material from straight root canal systems. The study was performed on 99 single-rooted extracted teeth using the ProTaper Gold endodontic rotary system up to the F2 file (Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland), which were sealed with GuttaCore (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and AH plus epoxy resin sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and randomly assigned to the following non-surgical retreatment techniques: ProTaper Retreatment endodontic rotary instruments (D1–D3 files, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland; n = 33, PTR), Reciproc Blue endodontic reciprocating instrument (R50, VDW, Munich, Germany; n = 33, RCB50), and a combined root canal retreatment technique between Gates-Glidden drills (sizes #3 and #2, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and Hedstrom files (file size 35, 30, and 25, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland; n = 33; H-GG). All of the teeth were submitted twice to a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scan, before and after non-surgical endodontic retreatment procedures. The volume of root canal filling material (mm 3 ), volume of remaining root canal filling material (mm 3 ), non-surgical endodontic retreatment working time (min), proportion of remaining root canal filling material (%), and efficacy of root canal filling material removal between the non-surgical endodontic retreatment techniques were analyzed using ANOVA one-way statistical analysis. Statistically significant differences were observed between the proportions of remaining root canal filling material of PTR and H-GG ( p = 0.018), between the non-surgical endodontic retreatment working times (min; p 0.001), and between the efficacies of root canal filling material removal by the non-surgical endodontic retreatment techniques ( p = 0.009). However, the non-surgical endodontic retreatment systems allow for similar carrier-based root canal filling material removal.
机译:本研究的目的是分析和比较三种非外科牙髓后退技术的疗效在从直根管系统中除去载体基根管填充材料。使用Propaper Gold Endontic Royary System对F2文件(Lentply Maillefer,瑞士)用Guttacore(Lentply Maillefer,Ballaigues,Switzerland)和Ah加环氧树脂密封封口机(Lentsply Detrey,Konstanz,德国)和随机分配到以下非手术撤退技术:ProTaper Retreatment endogontic旋转仪器(D1-D3文件,少数Maillefer,Ballaigues,瑞士; N = 33,PTR),Comproc Blue endogontic往复运动仪器(R50,VDW,德国慕尼黑; N = 33,RCB50)和盖茨玻璃钻头(尺寸#3和#2,Lentsply Maillefer,Ballaigues,Switzerland)和Hedstrom文件之间的组合根运河再处理技术(文件大小35,30和25,少数Maillefer,Ballaigues,瑞士; N = 33; H-GG)。所有牙齿都被提交两次,以微量计算断层扫描(Micro-CT)扫描,非手术牙髓性后退程序之前和之后。根管填充材料的体积(mm 3),剩余根管填充材料(mm 3)的体积,非手术牙髓后退工作时间(min),剩余根管填充材料的比例(%),以及根的功效使用ANOVA单向统计分析分析了在非外科牙髓后退技术之间去除的运河填充物质去除。在非手术牙髓后退工作时间(min; p <0.001)之间的剩余根管填充材料(P = 0.018)之间的剩余根管填充材料(P = 0.018)之间观察到统计学显着的差异(p = 0.018),以及根管的效率之间通过非手术牙髓后退技术填充材料(P = 0.009)。然而,非手术牙髓后退系统允许类似的载体基根管填充材料去除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号