首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Medical Informatics >Undergraduate Medical Students’ Search for Health Information Online: Explanatory Cross-Sectional Study
【24h】

Undergraduate Medical Students’ Search for Health Information Online: Explanatory Cross-Sectional Study

机译:本科医学院在线搜索健康信息:解释性横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Previous research shows that being a “digital native” or growing up in a digital environment does not necessarily lead to increased digital competencies, such as digital health literacy or evaluation of webpage quality. Objective This study showed how medical students searched for health information online, specifically the recommended testing for histamine intolerance, by comparing the use of various search engines (Google, Medisuch, and a website of the student’s choice) to find out more about search strategies in future health professionals. As Medisuch presents a qualitatively better search engine, we assumed that medical students using this search engine might find valid information faster on more reliable webpages, and might recommend the correct diagnostic steps for histamine intolerance to their patients more often than students using a generic search engine like Google. Methods Medical students in their third year of study were asked to find the relevant diagnostic steps of histamine intolerance online. They were randomly assigned to use one search engine: Google, their personal choice, or Medisuch. Their process of seeking information online was video recorded. Results In total, 140 medical students participated in this study. The total number of webpages found did not differ among the groups (P=.52). Students using Medisuch (P=.02) correctly identified the elimination diet as a relevant diagnostic step more frequently. The provocation test was reported by almost half of the students independent of the search engine used. In general, medical students commonly identified trustworthy webpages in all three groups (Google: 36/44, 82%; free choice: 31/36; 86%; and Medisuch: 35/45, 78%). Conclusions The results indicate that medical students were able to find trustworthy health-related information online independent of the search engine used. Medical students that are digital natives seem to have proper internet skills and a knowledge of how to use them. They entered specific medical terms (evidence-based diagnostic steps) or names of reliable webpages (DocCheck) in the search engines to gain correct information. However, it remains to be seen if this behavior can be called true “digital literacy”.
机译:背景技术前面的研究表明,作为数字环境中的“数字本地”或成长并不一定导致数字能力增加,例如数字健康识字或网页质量的评估。目的通过比较各种搜索引擎(谷歌,MEDISUCH和学生选择的网站)来了解医生在线搜索健康信息的医疗学生如何在线搜索健康信息的推荐测试,特别是关于搜索策略的更多信息未来的健康专业人士。由于MEDisuch呈现了一个定性更好的搜索引擎,我们认为使用此搜索引擎的医学生将在更可靠的网页上找到有效信息,并且可能会推荐与使用通用搜索引擎的学生更频繁地对其患者进行正确的诊断步骤像谷歌一样。方法检测医学院在学习的第三年的学习中,发现在线组胺不容忍的相关诊断步骤。他们被随机分配使用一个搜索引擎:谷歌,他们的个人选择或Medisuch。他们在线寻求信息的过程是视频记录。结果总计,140名医学生参加了这项研究。发现的网页总数在组中没有差异(p = .52)。使用MEDISUCH的学生(P = .02)正确地将消除饮食更频繁地确定了作为相关诊断步骤的消除饮食。普遍的挑衅测试由几乎一半的学生报告,独立于所使用的搜索引擎。一般来说,医学生通常在所有三个群体中确定了值得信赖的网页(Google:36/44,82%;免费选择:31/36; 86%;和Medisuch:35/45,78%)。结论结果表明,医学学生能够在网上找到独立于所使用的搜索引擎在线在线找到值得信赖的健康相关信息。作为数字本地人的医学生似乎具有适当的互联网技能和如何使用它们的知识。他们输入了特定的医疗术语(基于证据的诊断步骤)或搜索引擎中可靠的网页名称(Doccheck)以获得正确的信息。但是,如果这种行为可以称为真正的“数字识字性”,则仍然可以看到。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号