首页> 外文期刊>Weather and Climate Extremes >Which heatwave measure has higher predictive power to prevent health risks related to heat: EHF or GATO IV? – Evidence from modelling Lisbon mortality data from 1980 to 2016
【24h】

Which heatwave measure has higher predictive power to prevent health risks related to heat: EHF or GATO IV? – Evidence from modelling Lisbon mortality data from 1980 to 2016

机译:哪种热浪措施具有更高的预测能力,以防止与热量相关的健康风险:EHF或Gato IV? - 从1980年到2016年从Lisbon死亡率数据建模的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

To prevent the risk associated with heat-related health, several countries and institutions have built heat-health warning systems (HHWS). An HHWS is designed to alert the general public and decision-makers about the danger of high temperature by triggering a series of actions that avoid adverse health outcomes. The comparison of the various HHWS is complicated because there is no universal quantitative definition to predict and define a heatwave. The slightest variability at the threshold of definition the heatwave can trigger considerable differences in the action plan, health service demand and the time the population at risk must prepare. The choice of the index influences the number of days of heatwaves and its characteristics, such as severity. Estimating the risk of mortality associated with heatwave is variable according to the indexes, and the selection of the threshold is essential to prevent the burdens of heat on public health. The aim is the comparison between two metrics to know, which has higher predictive power to prevent health risks related to heat. On the one hand, a new way of defining heatwaves that have generated high consensus worldwide - the Excess Heat Factor (EHF); on the other hand, the Generalized Accumulated Thermal Overload (GATO IV) – an opportunity to improve the existing Lisbon heatwaves surveillance system. Daily mortalities and air temperatures from 1980 to 2016 in Lisbon with both indexes are modelled using Generalized Linear Models, with the calculation of the predictive power of the models using ROC curves for two levels of mortality severity. It is concluded that for total mortality, both indexes were statistically significant. Though, for daily mortality in individuals with 65 years or older with all diseases of the circulatory and respiratory system, when considering both indexes together, GATO IV was the only index significantly predicting the impact of heatwaves on mortality. GATO IV metric seems to have the best statistical properties. Nevertheless, EHF also stands out as a good indicator to predict heat-related mortality in Lisbon.
机译:为了防止与热相关的健康有关的风险,若干国家和机构已经建造了热健康警告系统(HHW)。 HHWS旨在通过触发一系列避免不良健康结果的一系列行动来提醒通用公众和决策者的危险。各种HHW的比较是复杂的,因为没有通用定量定义来预测和定义热波。定义阈值的丝毫可变性热浪可以触发行动计划,健康服务需求以及风险的人口必须准备的时间相当差异。该指数的选择会影响热浪的天数及其特征,如严重程度。根据指数估计与热波相关的死亡风险是可变的,并且选择阈值对于防止对公共卫生的热量负担至关重要。目的是要知道的两项指标之间的比较,这具有更高的预测能力,以防止与热量有关的健康风险。一方面,在全世界产生高共识的热浪定义热浪的新方法 - 过量的热因子(EHF);另一方面,广义累积的热过载(Gato IV) - 一种改善现有里斯本热浪监测系统的机会。每日死亡率和空气温度从1980年到2016年的Lisbon与两个索引都使用广义的线性模型进行建模,计算使用ROC曲线进行模型的预测功率,用于两级死亡率严重程度。结论是,对于总死亡率,两种指数都具有统计学意义。虽然,对于65岁或以上的个人疾病的每日死亡率,当循环和呼吸系统的所有疾病在一起时,Gato IV都认为唯一的指标是显着预测热浪对死亡率的影响的唯一指标。 Gato IV度量似乎具有最佳的统计特性。尽管如此,EHF也被视为预测里斯本热相关死亡率的良好指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号