首页> 外文期刊>Urology Annals >Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
【24h】

Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography

机译:用卢特测定液体放射治疗抗腐蚀前列腺癌患者的响应评价:实体瘤中响应评价标准的响应评价标准的比较,实体瘤中正面瘤,欧洲研究和治疗组织巨蟹座和MDA标准由镓68-前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子排放断层摄影层析成像分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: We evaluated various morphological and molecular response criteria in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) patient undergoing peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRLT) with Lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) by using Gallium 68-PSMA positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (Ga68-PSMA PET-CT). Methods: A total of 46 pre- and 8–12 weeks' post-PRLT Ga68-PSMA PET-CT studies were reanalyzed (23 comparisons). Prostate-specific antigen drop of ≥50% and ≥25% increase was considered as partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD), respectively, for biochemical response (BR) while change in-between was considered as stable disease (SD). Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and MD Anderson (MDA) criteria for morphological response while PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0 (PERCIST 1.0) and European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) criteria for molecular response were used. Kappa coefficient was derived to see the level of agreement. Results: The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by BR and RECIST criteria was 9 (39.13%), 3 (13.04%), and 11 (47.83%) and 5 (21.74%), 2 (8.70%), and 16 (69.57%), respectively. The proportion of PD, PR, and SD was same by PERCIST and EORTC criteria and which were 8 (34.78%), 5 (21.74%), and 10 (43.48%). The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by MDA criteria was 1 (4.35%), 1 (4.35%), and 21 (91.30%), respectively. Poor agreement between BR and both morphological criteria while a statistically significant agreement with both molecular criteria seen. Conclusion: We concluded that molecular criteria performed better than morphological criteria in response assessment by Ga68-PSMA PET-CT in metastatic castration resistant PCa patients undergoing PRLT.
机译:引言:通过使用镓68-PSMA正电子发射断层扫描,在经历肽受体放射性和治疗(PRLT)的肽受体放射性和治疗(PRLT)的转移性阉割抗性前列腺癌(PCA)患者中的各种形态和分子响应标准进行了评估 - 仿胀断层扫描(GA68-PESMA PET-CT)。方法:重新分析PRLT GA68-PSMA PET-CT研究总共46个和8-12周的第8-12周的第46页(23比较)。 ≥50%≥50%和≥25%的前列腺特异性抗原滴被视为分别为生物化学反应(BR)的部分反应(PR)和渐进性疾病(PD),同时认为在间变化被认为是稳定的疾病(SD) 。响应评估标准在实体肿瘤中1.1(RECIST 1.1)和MD Anderson(MDA)的形态反应标准,而实体肿瘤的宠物响应标准1.0(Percist 1.0)和欧洲研究和治疗癌症(EORTC)的分子反应标准的标准用过的。推导出kappa系数,以查看协议水平。结果:BR和再思序的Pd,Pr和Sd的比例为9(39.13%),3(13.04%)和11(47.83%)和5(21.74%),2(8.70%)和16个(69.57%)分别。 Pd,Pr和Sd的比例由Percist和Eortc标准相同,其为8(34.78%),5(21.74%)和10(43.48%)。 MDA标准Pd,Pr和Sd的比例分别为1(4.35%),1(4.35%)和21(91.30%)。 BR与形态标准之间的差的协议,而统计学上具有统计学意义的同情。结论:我们得出结论,通过GA68-PSMA PET-CT在接受PRLT的转移阉割PCA患者中的响应评估的形态标准,进行了分子标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号