...
首页> 外文期刊>SSM - Population Health >Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
【24h】

Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research

机译:基于人口的群组中的区域和个人级别收入措施之间的协议:对人口健康研究的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Socioeconomic status is an important determinant of health, the measurement of which is of great significance to population health research. However, individual-level socioeconomic factors are absent from much health administrative data, resulting in widespread use of area-level measures in their place. This study aims to clarify the role of individual- and area-level socioeconomic status in Ontario, Canada, through comparison of income measures.Using data from four cycles (2005–2012) of the Canadian Community Health Survey, we assessed concordance between individual- and area-level income quintiles using percent agreement and Kappa statistics. Individual-level characteristics were compared at baseline. Cumulative adult premature mortality was calculated for 5-years following interview. Rates were calculated separately for area-level and individual-level income, and jointly for each combination of income groups. Multivariable negative binomial models were fit to estimate associations between area- and individual-level income quintile and premature mortality after adjustment for basic demographics (age, sex, interview cycle) and key risk factors (alcohol, smoking, physical activity, and body mass index).Agreement between individual- and area-level income measures was low. Kappa statistics for same and similar (i.e. ±1 quintile) measures were 0.11 and 0.48, indicating low and moderate agreement, respectively. Socioeconomic disparities in premature mortality were greater for individual-level income than area-level income. When rates were stratified by both area- and individual-level income quintiles simultaneously, individual-level income gradients persisted within each area-level income group. The association between income and premature mortality was significant for both measures, including after full adjustment.Area-level socioeconomic status is an inappropriate proxy for missing individual-level data. The low agreement between area- and individual-level income measures and differences in demographic profile indicate that the two socioeconomic status measures do not capture the same population groups. However, our findings demonstrate that both individual- and area-level income measures are associated with premature mortality, and describe unique socioeconomic inequities.
机译:社会经济地位是健康的重要决定因素,其测量对人口健康研究具有重要意义。然而,从卫生行政数据中缺乏个性化社会经济因素,导致在其位置广泛使用面积级措施。本研究旨在澄清加拿大安大略省安大略省的个人和面积社会经济地位的作用,通过收入措施。从加拿大社区卫生调查的四个周期(2005-2012)的数据,我们在个人之间评估了一致使用百分比协议和kappa统计,地区级收入Quintiles。在基线比较个体级别特征。采访后5年计算累积成年过早死亡率。利率分别计算面积和个人级别收入,并共同为每个收入群体组合。多变量负二项型模型适合估计区域和个人级别收入之间的关联,在调整基本人口统计学(年龄,性别,访谈周期)和关键危险因素(酒精,吸烟,身体活动和体重指数后)。个人和地区级收入措施之间的造成低点。 Kappa统计,同样且相似(即±1五分)的措施分别为0.11和0.48,分别表示低和中等协议。对于个人级别的收入而言,过早死亡率的社会经济差异比面积级收入更大。当率和个人级别收入五分家同时分裂率时,每个区域级收入集团的个人级收入梯度仍然存在。收入和过早死亡之间的关联对于这两项措施都很重要,包括在全面调整后.AREA级社会经济地位是缺少个体级数据的不当代理。区域和个人级别收入措施之间的低协议和人口统计概况的差异表明,两项社会经济地位措施不会捕获相同的人口群体。然而,我们的调查结果表明,个人和地区级收入措施都与过早死亡率有关,并描述了独特的社会经济不公平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号