...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Improving Phosphorus Use Efficiency and Optimizing Phosphorus Application Rates for Maize in the Northeast Plain of China for Sustainable Agriculture
【24h】

Improving Phosphorus Use Efficiency and Optimizing Phosphorus Application Rates for Maize in the Northeast Plain of China for Sustainable Agriculture

机译:改善磷利用效率,优化中国东北平原玉米磷应用速率,可持续农业

获取原文
           

摘要

Optimizing the phosphorus (P) application rate can increase grain yield while reducing both cost and environmental impact. However, optimal P rates vary substantially when different targets such as maximum yield or maximum economic benefit are considered. The present study used field experiment conducted at 36 experiments sites for maize to determine the impact of P application levels on grain yield, plant P uptake, and P agronomy efficiency (AE P ), P-derived yield benefits and private profitability, and to evaluated the agronomically (AOPR), privately (POPR), and economically (EOPR) optimal P rate at a regional scale. Four treatments were compared: No P fertilizer (P 0 ); P rate of 45–60 kg ha ?1 (LP); P rate of 90–120 kg ha ?1 (MP); P rate of 135–180 kg ha ?1 (HP). P application more effectively increased grain yield, reaching a peak at MP treatment. The plant P uptake in HP treatment was 37.4% higher than that in P0. The relationship between P uptake by plants (y) and P application rate (x) can be described by the equation y = ?0.0003x 2 + 0.1266x + 31.1 (R 2 = 0.309, p 0.01). Furthermore, grain yield (y) and plant P uptake (x) across all treatments also showed a significant polynomial function (R 2 = 0.787–0.846). The MP treatment led to highest improvements in P agronomic efficiency (AEP), P-derived yield benefits (BY) and private profitability (BP) compared with those in other treatments. In addition, the average agronomically (AOPR), privately (POPR), and economically optimal P rate (EOPR) in 36 experimental sites were suggested as 127.9 kg ha ?1 , 110.8 kg ha ?1 , and 114.4 kg ha ?1 , which ranged from 80.6 to 211.3 kg ha ?1 , 78.2 to 181.8 kg ha ?1 , and 82.6 to 151.6 kg ha ?1 , respectively. Economically optimal P application (EOPR) can be recommended, because EOPR significantly reduced P application compared with AOPR, and average economically optimal yield was slightly higher compared with the average yield in the MP treatment. This study was conducive in providing a more productive, use-effective, profitable, environment-friendly P fertilizer management strategy for supporting maximized production potential and environment sustainable development.
机译:优化磷(P)施用率可以提高谷物产量,同时降低成本和环境影响。然而,当考虑不同的目标如最大产量或最大经济效益的不同目标,最佳P率大幅度变化。本研究采用现场实验在36个实验部位进行玉米,以确定P应用水平对粮食产量,植物P吸收和PAGAGROMY效率(AE P),P衍生的产量福利和私人盈利能力的影响,并评估该农艺上(AOPR),私下(POPR)和经济上(EOPR)最佳P速率在区域等级。比较了四种治疗方法:没有P肥料(P 0); P速率为45-60千克HA?1(LP); P速率为90-120千克HA?1(MP); P速率为135-180千克HA?1(HP)。 P应用更有效地增加了谷物产量,在MP处理达到峰值。 HP处理中的植物P摄取比P0高37.4%。通过植物(Y)和P施加速率(X)的P接受的关系可以通过等式Y =Δ0.0003x2+ 0.1266x + 31.1(r 2 = 0.309,p <0.01)。此外,在所有处理中的谷物产量(Y)和植物P吸收(X)也显示出显着的多项式功能(R 2 = 0.787-0.846)。 MP处理导致了与其他治疗中的P衍生的产量效率(AEP),P衍生的产量福利(按)和私人盈利(BP)的最高提高。此外,在36个实验遗址中的普通农艺上(AOPR),私下(POPR),私下(POPR)和经济上最佳的P速率(EOPR)被提出为127.9千克HA?1,110.8 kg HA?1,114.4千克HA?1,哪个从80.6到211.3公斤Ha?1,78.2至181.8 kg ha?1,82.6至151.6 kg ha?1。可以推荐经济上最佳的P应用(EOPR),因为与AOPL相比,恒化的P&显着降低了P施用,与MP处理中的平均产量相比,平均经济上最佳产量略高。本研究有利于提供更高效,使用的有效,有利可图,环保的P肥料管理战略,用于支持最大化的生产潜力和环境可持续发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号