首页> 外文期刊>Sociobiology >The Habitat Affects the Ecological Interactions between Azteca Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Cecropia Loefl. (Urticaceae Juss.)
【24h】

The Habitat Affects the Ecological Interactions between Azteca Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Cecropia Loefl. (Urticaceae Juss.)

机译:栖息地影响阿兹科堡(Hymenoptera:Formicidae)和Cecropia Lofl之间的生态相互作用。 (荨麻疹juss。)

获取原文
           

摘要

In order to understand the effects of human impacts on structure and functioning of tropical forests, we should consider studies on animal-plant interactions such as antplant mutualistic interactions.We investigated the mutualistic interactions between ants (Azteca genera) and Cecropia plants in habitats of secondary forest and pasture used as cattle fields. We tested for the following hyphothesis: (i) Cecropia from pasture are more susceptible to foliar herbivory than the Cecropia from the forest, and (ii) the defense promoted by ants of Azteca genus is less efficient in the pasture when compared to the forested areas. We selected four areas inserted in Atlantic rain forest domain surrounded by secondary forest and by cattle pastures. The herbivory was more intense in the pasture than in the secondary forest. The presence of Azteca species diminished foliar herbivory only in the forested areas, where we observed a significant increase in herbivory after the removal of A. alfari colony. We argue that the greater herbivory in pasture occurs probably due the lack of other plant resource, being Cecropia paschystachya Trécul and C. glaziovii Snethl., isolated in a “sea of grass” without connection with other tree vegetation, opposite scenario observed in forested habitats. The defense of Azteca only in the secondary forest, leading us to suppose that: 1) not even the your aggressive behavior is able to reduce the intense herbivory in the pasture; 2) the your behavioral pattern in forest is not the same in deforested environments and / or 3) mutualism may be undergoing changes due to abiotic effects on pasture.
机译:为了了解人类影响对热带森林的结构和运作的影响,我们应该考虑对抗植物互动相互作用等动物相互作用的研究。我们研究了蚂蚁(Azteca)和患有次级栖息地的抗植物植物之间的互动相互作用森林和牧场用作牛领域。我们测试了以下封装:(i)来自牧草的植物来自牧羊犬的皮切教比来自森林的康氏粒度更容易受到植物征的,而(ii)与森林地区相比,Azteca属的蚂蚁促进的抗辩在牧场上的效率较低。我们选择了四个区域,插入了大西洋雨林领域,被次要森林和牛牧场包围。草食病在牧场比在次要森林中更强烈。 Azteca物种的存在仅在森林地区均减少叶面草本,在去除A.苜蓿殖民地后观察到草食病的显着增加。我们认为,牧场的更多草食病可能发生可能是由于缺乏其他植物资源,是CeCropia paschystachyatrécul和c. glaziovii snethl。,隔离在一个“草地海”而没有与其他树植被的联系,在森林栖息地观察到的相反情景。只有在二级森林中的辩护,导致我们认为:1)甚至你的侵略性行为甚至不能减少牧场的强烈的草食病; 2)森林中的行为模式在森林环境中的行为模式与/或3)和/或3)相互主义可能正在发生因牧场的非生物作用而发生变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号